William M. Schreiber

Attorney in Red Bank, NJ
Law Secretary to the Honorable Thomas R. Rumana, Judge of the New Jersey Superior Court, 1973-1974. Member, New Jersey Association of Matrimonial Arbitrators, 1993—. Seminar: "Children, Divorce, and Custody," Institute for Continuing Legal Education, 1998. Senior Editor, New Jersey Family Lawyer, 2001.
732-842-7272
Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.8 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Matrimonial Law
  • Divorce
  • Appellate Practice
  • Family Law
  • Trial Practice

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

in Family Law
4.8 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
4.9
Analytical Capabilities
4.9
Judgment
4.8
Communication Ability
4.8
Legal Experience
4.9

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/25/13
5.0 out of 5.0
He truly deserving of the highest rating.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/19/13
4.8 out of 5.0
Highly ethical and experienced family law attorney
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/17/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Fellow of AAML
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1973, New Jersey and U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
1975, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Syracuse University
    Class of 1973
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Franklin & Marshall College
    Class of 1970
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1948
    Passaic, New Jersey, March 29, 1948

    Associations & Memberships

    Monmouth (Co-Chair, Family Law Committee, 2006), New Jersey State (Member, Executive Committee, Family Law Section, 1979-1984, 1985-1992, 1993—) and American Bar Associations; Americ... More

    Certifications

    (Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Attorney )

    Representative Cases

    B.P. v. G.P. and C.L., 222 N.J. Super. 101, App. Div., 1989; Ward v. Ward, 164 N.J. Super. 354, Chan. Div., 1979; N.J. v. Nolfi, 141 N.J. Super. 528, 1976.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    732-842-7272

    Email

    Send email to William M. Schreiber


    Office Information
    William M. Schreiber
    Member
     199 Broad Street, P.O. Drawer 789,
    Red Bank, NJ 07701

    Maintains an office in multiple locations
    Loading...

    Logo
    Hoffman & Schreiber (Red Bank, New Jersey)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.