Gregory J. Sperlich

Attorney in Rapid City, SD
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Defense
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Insurance Litigation
  • Personal Injury

 

Overall Client Rating

3.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.0
Responsiveness
3.0
Quality of Service
3.0
Value for Money
3.0

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 10/16/14
Posted by a Consumer on 10/16/14
1.0 out of 5.0
Mr. Sperlich failed to communicate with me the same information as he communicated to the opposing counsel. He misrepresented my wishes at every turn. He was incompetent, lazy and when I asked for help resigned as my counsel. I would attempt to traverse the legal system alone before I would ever hire Mr. Sperlich or any attorney from his firm. My experience with him has left me disillusioned about our legal system and the power that an attorney has.
Report abuse
Posted by a Small Business on 09/17/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr Sperlich has been the most helpful, knowledgeable and responsive attorney we have used while we have been in business which is 30 plus years.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1997, South Dakota


Featured Lawyers
Loading...


Gunderson, Palmer, Nelson & Ashmore, LLP
Rapid City, U.S.A.
605-388-2839 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.3 / 5.0

Gunderson, Palmer, Nelson & Ashmore, LLP
Rapid City, U.S.A.
605-388-2839 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.7 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.