Jason N. Tuttle

Attorney in Raleigh, NC
Jason attended North Carolina State University majoring in psychology with a pre-law emphasis. Jason then worked for a year as a litigation paralegal prior to attending law school at North Carolina Central University. At Central he was a member of the Law Journal and graduated with honors in 2000. He has practiced in the areas of personal injury, worker’s compensation and District Court Criminal and Traffic matters over the last ten years, most recently as the principal of The Tuttle Law Firm, P.L.L.C.


Jason finds personal injury work to be rewarding because it allows him the opportunity to assist accident victims through the difficult times that arise when an injury has disrupted their lives. Jason’s compassion for his clients, coupled with his experience in dealing with all aspects of the insurance claims process and his committed work ethic, make him an effective and trusted advocate for his clients’ rights.


Jason is a member of the American Bar Association, North Carolina Bar Association, Wake County Bar Association (WCBA), and North Carolina Advocates for Justice. He currently serves on the Athletics Committee of the WCBA and is commissioner of its basketball league. He has volunteered with the Healing Hands of Wake County and the Capital Area Teen Court serving as a Teen Court Judge. He has served as a guest lecturer on the subject of Trial Practice at North Carolina State University.


Jason is married to the former Heather Wilson of Fayetteville, and they have three sons. He is a member of Hayes Barton Baptist Church where he teaches Fourth Grade Sunday School. He enjoys spending time with his family, attending N.C. State sporting events, playing basketball, watching movies and reading.


919-578-9589

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Personal Injury

 

Overall Client Rating

5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 04/16/13
Posted by a Consumer on 04/16/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Jason was completely on the ball with follow up and communication. I felt he knew exactly how to negotiate my settlement and was very comfortable having him handle my case. He set the proper expectations and absolutely delivered. I have recommended him and will continue to do so.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 04/16/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Jason is a thorough, effective attorney. He is responsive and does his homework. He thinks through issues before he reacts. He is truly all about his clients. My experience with Jason and his firm was extremely positive.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 2000, North Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Eastern U.S. District Court, North Carolina

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    North Carolina Central University, School of Law
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University Attended

    North Carolina State University
    Class of 1996
    B.A.
    Psychology

    Birth Information

    Born in 1973
    1973

    Associations & Memberships

    American Bar Association; North Carolina Bar Association; Wake County Bar Association; North Carolina Advocates for Justice, Membership Committee Co-Chair for the Triangle, 2013.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    919-755-0025 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to Jason N. Tuttle


    Office Information
    Jason N. Tuttle
    Partner
    The Historic Briggs Hardware Building 220 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300,
    Raleigh, NC 27601

    Loading...

    Logo
    Everett Gaskins Hancock LLP (Raleigh, North Carolina)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.