Jon M. Anderson

Attorney in Providence, RI
Jon joined the Firm in 1989 after clerking for Judge James Hunter III on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. He practices in the areas of education law, complex civil litigation, unfair trade practices and antitrust.

Before Edwards Wildman

Prior to joining the Firm, Jon was a law clerk to the Honorable James Hunter, III, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. During law school Jon was an Executive Editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.

Besides Edwards Wildman

For eleven years Jon served as an elected member of the Pawtucket School Committee. In addition, Jon was the 1999 Recipient of the Rhode Island Bar Association's Pro Bono Publico Award.

Experience

Court Victory Upholding Client's Election Win

In October 2012, our government team in our Providence office won a victory in the Rhode Island Supreme Court upholding the one-vote win of our client for a seat in the Rhode Island House of Representatives.

Insights
National Business Institute's Special Education Laws Made Simple Seminar
December 5, 2014 event
National Business Institute Seminar
January 24, 2014 event
Client Advisory - Rhode Island Becomes The Third State To Provide Paid Family Leave For Employees
July 2013 publication
NBI's Lawfully Managing Student Records Without Violating Privacy Rights
November 14, 2012 event
NBI's Rhode Island Special Education Law Seminar
June 4, 2012 event
School Defenses To Common Lawsuits
October 18, 2011 event
2011 Learning Differences Awareness Conference
October 1, 2011 event
E-Technology at School: Preventing Lawsuits
October 23, 2009 event
State Antitrust Practice and Statutes
September 18, 2009 publication
Client Advisory - Businesses That Sell to Resellers May Be Free To Control Resale Prices - Supreme Court Overrules 96-Year-Old Ban on Resale Price Maintenance
June 29, 2007 publication

News
Edwards Wildman's Jon Anderson Successfully Obtains a Majority of the RI Supreme Court for Seat in the RI House of Representatives
October 11, 2012
The Firm is Recognized in the American Lawyer
July 7, 2008
Firm Represents Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited in $8.8 Billion Acquisition of Millennium Pharmaceuticals
April 10, 2008

401-276-6493
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Complex Litigation
  • Antitrust/Competition Law
  • Municipal Insolvency and Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
  • Banking & Financial Institutions
  • Healthcare
  • Educational Institutions

 

Peer Rating

bv

Overall Peer Rating

4.4 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in Massachusetts
Rhode Island
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
U.S. Tax Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Federal District Court, District of Massachusetts
Federal District Court, District of Rhode Island
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Law School Attended

University of Pennsylvania
Class of 1988
J.D.
magna cum laude

University Attended

Brown University
Class of 1983
A.B.
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1961
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, April 8, 1961

Associations & Memberships

Membership

Rhode Island Bar Association

Contact Information

Phone

401-276-6493

Fax

401 276 6611

Email

Send email to Jon M. Anderson


Office Information
Jon M. Anderson
Counsel
 2800 Financial Plaza,
Providence, RI 02903

Loading...

Logo
Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP (Providence, Rhode Island)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.