Jon M. Anderson

Attorney in Providence, RI
Jon joined the Firm in 1989 after clerking for Judge James Hunter III on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. He practices in the areas of education law, complex civil litigation, unfair trade practices and antitrust.

•Jon is counsel to numerous public school districts, public charter schools and private schools in Rhode Island. Jon has represented these educational institutions in a wide variety of contexts, including dealing with highly sensitive matters in the public spotlight. He appears regularly in state and federal courts and represents clients before the U.S. Department of Education and the Rhode Island Department of Education. He has also represented the Rhode Island Department of Administration as education counsel in conjunction with the bankruptcy of the City of Central Falls, Rhode Island.

•Jon deals with claims at the local, state and federal levels under the Americans with Disabilities Acts, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

•Jon has been involved in state and federal antitrust investigations involving price fixing, monopolization, refusals to deal and exclusive dealing.

•Jon has overseen federal grand jury productions in California, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, New Jersey and North Carolina.

•Jon provides business advice regarding mergers, acquisitions, franchising, and antitrust compliance.

•Jon has represented numerous individual, estates and firms in the United States Tax Court and before the Rhode Island Division of Taxation.

Key Reported Decisions

Tobon v. Rhode Island Board of Elections, No. 62A.3d 1126 (R.I. 2012) (upholding one vote victory of candidate for the state legislature).

N.F. v. Chariho Regional School District, C.A. No. 11-177-ML, 2012 WL 723124 (D.R.I. Mar. 1, 2012) (upholding administrative decision in favor of school district in a special education dispute)

K.G. v. Sheehan,C.A. 09-229ML, 2010 WL 644782 (D.R.I. Dec 30, 2010) (prevailing party in special education matter).

Felkner v. Chariho Regional School Committee, 968 A.2d 865 (R.I. 2009) (successfully defended regional school committee in quo warranto action).

Bowen v. Mollis, 945 A.2d 314 (R.I. 2008) (successfully defended Speaker of the House and President of the Senate in constitutional challenge addressing what constituted a general election).

Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation v. The Parking Company, L.P.,892 A.2d 87 (R.I. 2006) (overturned taking of parking garage by state economic development corporation).

Lt. T.B. ex rel. N.B. v. Warwick School Committee, 361 F.3d 80 (1st Cir. 2004) (prevailing party in special education matter).

T.B. v. Warwick School Department, No. Civ. A. 01-122T, 2003 WL 22069432 (D.R.I. 2003) (prevailing party in special education matter).

Siena v. Microsoft Corp., 796 A.2d 461 (R.I. 2002) (no indirect purchaser action under the Rhode Island Antitrust Act).

Alicea v. Citifinancial Services, Inc., 210 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D. Mass. 2002) (safe harbor in TILA immunized mortgage lender from TILA liability).

Fluehmann v. Associates Financial Services, No. Civ. A. 01-40076-NMG, 2002 WL 500564 (D. Mass. Mar. 29, 2002) (motion to arbitrate granted despite fact that one mortgagor never signed arbitration agreement).

Bessette v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., 230 F.3d 439 (1st Cir. 2000) (no private right of action under the reaffirmation provision of the Bankruptcy Code).

Before Edwards Wildman

Prior to joining the Firm, Jon was a law clerk to the Honorable James Hunter, III, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. During law school Jon was an Executive Editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.

Besides Edwards Wildman

For eleven years Jon served as an elected member of the Pawtucket School Committee. In addition, Jon was the 1999 Recipient of the Rhode Island Bar Association's Pro Bono Publico Award.

401-276-6493
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Complex Litigation
  • Antitrust/Competition Law
  • Municipal Insolvency and Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
  • Banking & Financial Institutions
  • Healthcare
  • Educational Institutions

 

Peer Rating

bv

Overall Peer Rating

4.4 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in U.S. Court of Appeals
U.S. Court of Appeals
U.S. Court of Appeals
Federal District Court
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Tax Court
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
Federal District Court

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Law School Attended

University of Pennsylvania
Class of 1988
J.D.
magna cum laude

University Attended

Brown University
Class of 1983
A.B.
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1961
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, April 8, 1961

Associations & Memberships

Memberships

Rhode Island Bar Association

Contact Information

Phone

401-276-6493

Fax

401 276 6611

Email

Send email to Jon M. Anderson


Office Information
Jon M. Anderson
Counsel
 2800 Financial Plaza,
Providence, RI 02903

Loading...

Logo
Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP (Providence, Rhode Island)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.