Bruce M. Gorman, Jr.

Attorney in Princeton, NJ
Bruce Gorman concentrates his practice in general commercial litigation, contract law, antitrust law, white collar criminal defense, labor and employment, insurance, and business torts.

He is experienced with motions practice, oral argument, the discovery process, trial practice and post-trial work.

During law school, Mr. Gorman internedfor the Honorable Stephen S. Mitchell with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court inAlexandria,Virginia.


Blank Rome Successfully Obtains Reversal of $9 Million Verdict[Press Release]
April 4, 2013
Bruce M. Gorman, Jr., Stephen M. Orlofsky and Adrienne C. Rogove

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Commercial and Corporate Litigation


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2004, New Jersey
2005, Florida and New York
U.S. District Court - Eastern District of New York
U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida
U.S. District Court - New Jersey
U.S. District Court - Southern District of Florida
U.S. District Court - Southern District of New York

Law School Attended

Cornell Law School

University Attended

Colgate University
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1978
Cape May, New Jersey, August 8, 1978

Representative Cases

Representative Matters; Successfully prosecuted a novel antitrust claim on behalf of a client against the leading manufacturer of restaurant POS systems. Obtained dismissal of a complaint seeking over $1 million in damages on summary judgment, as well as a large recovery on clients' counterclaims in a civil litigation arising out of a business disp... More

Contact Information






Send email to Bruce M. Gorman, Jr.

Office Information
Bruce M. Gorman, Jr.
 301 Carnegie Center, Suite 303,
Princeton, NJ 08543


Blank Rome LLP (Princeton, New Jersey)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.