Jason M. Spindler

Attorney in Princeton, IN
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Adoption
  • Child Custody
  • General Litigation
  • Municipal Law
  • Bankruptcy
  • Personal Injury
  • Criminal


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Bankruptcy and Personal Injury
3.7 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 06/18/13
Posted by a Consumer on 06/18/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Very professional office. Jason helped my legal experience be a lot less stressful than I imagined. Seems like a really nice guy; would recommend him to my friends.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 02/24/13
4.3 out of 5.0
I could not afford to continue you my services with Jason. He refunded me all of my money except $100. He said that we could use it at a later date if I decided to come back. He responded to my calls in a timely manner. And even though I know he was busy, he made me feel like he always had time for any one of his clients.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2005, Indiana
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana

Law School Attended

Thomas M. Cooley Law School
Class of 2005

University Attended

Purdue University
Class of 2001

Featured Lawyers

Bamberger, Foreman, Oswald & Hahn, LLP
Princeton, U.S.A.
812-386-6482 | Email
Client Rating

4.5 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

Hall, Partenheimer & Kinkle
Princeton, U.S.A.
812-386-0050 | Email
Client Rating

4.5 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.