Aimee St. Hilaire, Esq.

Attorney in Prince Frederick, MD

Aimee B. St.Hilaire practices family law at Cumberland & Erly, LLC, concentrating her practice on domestic litigation, divorce, custody, child support, and domestic violence matters. She graduated cum laude from the University of Maryland College Park in 2001, where she was a member of the Honors Program and Phi Beta Kappa National Honor Society, and went on to earn her Juris Doctor cum laude from the University of Baltimore School of Law in 2007. While in law school, Ms. St.Hilaire was a member of law review, and clerked for the Honorable Pamela L. North, Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County.

Ms. St.Hilaire was admitted to practice law in Maryland in 2007 and in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 2008. After law school and before joining Cumberland & Erly, LLC, she clerked for the Honorable Nancy Davis-Loomis, Administrative Judge, Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County.

For the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years, Ms. St.Hilaire volunteered as the attorney coach for Calvert High School Mock Trial Team.

Professional Associations & Memberships

- Maryland State Bar Association, Member

- Anne Arundel County Bar Association, Member

- Calvert County Bar Association, Member

443-295-6264
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.5 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Domestic Relations
  • Family Law
  • Alimony
  • Divorce
  • Postnuptial Agreements
  • Domestic Violence
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Spousal Support
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Visitation Rights

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

in Family Law and General Practice
4.5 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
4.4
Analytical Capabilities
4.5
Judgment
4.7
Communication Ability
4.7
Legal Experience
3.9

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Judge on 11/29/12
5.0 out of 5.0
Ms. St. Hilaire has appeared before me on a regular basis. Some of the cases have had complex issues. Without fail she has come prepared, organized and made very good legal arguments.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 11/27/12
4.8 out of 5.0
Ms. St. Hilaire is a very astute and intelligent lawyer. She is an asset to the Legal community. She is very honest and fair in connection with her practice of law and dealing with opposing counsel.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 10/25/12
4.4 out of 5.0
Aimee is easy to work with but still a zealous advocate for her clients.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Attorney

Admission Details

Admitted in 2007, Maryland
2008, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland

Credit Cards Accepted
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Baltimore School of Law
    Class of 2007
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University Attended

    University of Maryland
    Class of 2001
    B.S.
    cum laude

    Birth Information

    Born in 1979
    Misawa, Japan, 1979

    Languages

    French

    Associations & Memberships

    Anne Arundel and Calvert County Bar Associations; Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    410-535-5300 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to Aimee St. Hilaire, Esq.


    Office Information
    Aimee St. Hilaire, Esq.
    Attorney
     481 Main Street,
    Prince Frederick, MD 20678

    Loading...

    Logo
    Cumberland & Erly, LLC (Prince Frederick, Maryland)

    Video
    Play Law Firm Video
    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.