Jerome A. Blaha

Attorney in Pleasanton, CA

Jerome Blaha, managing partner, founded what is now Blaha, Hartford, Perry & Anastopoulos in 1973. He represents clients in all aspects of family law, estates and trusts. He is a California State Bar Certified Family Law Specialist and a section member (family law, tax, estates and trusts) in the American Bar Association and other bar associations. Mr. Blaha has extensive experience in family law, including Child Custody, Business Valuation, Securities, Characterization and Tracing of Assets and Income Tax issues, Mediation, and effecting emotional Pre- and Post-Marital Agreements, and in estate law, including analysis of estates, preparation of Trusts, Wills and other documents to effect clients' desired Estate Plans, Probate of Estates, Administration of Trusts, and Contests of Wills and Trusts.

Having handled over 5,000 divorce or family law-related cases and over 2,000 wills and trusts cases, Mr. Blaha has perfected a unique and highly effective approach that results in a win-win solution. He thoroughly prepares his clients to settle their cases before litigation or, if necessary, meticulously prepares clients and witnesses for trial. His goal is to efficiently facilitate the best win-win settlement, at every stage, for each case.

Mr. Blaha maintains a thriving practice, and often serves as a family law expert in the community. He has presented and published materials for many organizations, including California Continuing Education of the Bar and KCBS Radio's Legal Magazine. Mr. Blaha has also served as Judge Pro Tem in the Family Law and Probate Departments of the California Superior Court, Alameda County.

Mr. Blaha is involved in community services as member and past President of the Board of Directors of Castro Valley Chamber of Commerce, past President on many committees, including Rotary International; past President and member of the Board of Trustees of Bentley School; life member of the University of California at Berkeley Alumni Association and U.C. Berkeley Alumni Club of Castro Valley; and former member of Alameda County Task Study for General Plan.

Lecturer: "Tax Consequences in Family Law and Retirement Equity Act"; "Family Law for Legal Secretaries"; "Prenuptial Expectation Agreements"; "Wills, Trusts, Taxes for Estate Planning"; "Real Property Tax Consequences and Alternatives for Income, Gift, Estate and Property Taxes". Guest Speaker, "Legal Magazine," KCBS Radio. Judge Pro Tem, Family Law Departments, Alameda County Superior Court.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Property Law
  • Child Custody
  • Divorce
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Family Mediation
  • Collaborative Law
  • Wills
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Estate Planning
  • Trust Administration
  • Probate


Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1973, California

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Hastings College of the Law

    University Attended

    University of California, Berkeley

    Birth Information

    Born in 1943

    Associations & Memberships

    Alameda County and American (Taxation, Real Property, Probate, Trust Law and Family Law Sections) Bar Associations; The State Bar of California; Tri-Valley Estate Planning Council; Association ... More


    (Certified Specialist, Family Law, The State Bar of California Board Of Legal Specialization)

    Contact Information




    Send email to Jerome A. Blaha

    Office Information
    Jerome A. Blaha
     4900 Hopyard Road, Suite 240,
    Pleasanton, CA 94588


    Blaha, Hartford, Perry & Anastopoulos (Pleasanton, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.