James R. Freeman, Esquire

Law Firm in Phoenixville, PA
Former District Attorney... General Practitioner serving clients

since 1970...Call 610-935-7744 and get James Freeman now!

484-928-0209

About This Firm

I am a sole practitioner with 42 years of courtroom experience. I served as Chester County's first full-time District Attorney. When you retain my services I will be the one standing beside you; no one else. You can rest assured I will do everything in my power to guide you safely through the criminal or civil maze that may be confronting you. I have handled thousands of cases and take pride in what I do. I believe I am known to be relentless in my efforts to obtain the best possible disposition for my clients. After 42 years I won't say that I've seen it all but I suggest it would take ingenuity and imagination before I couldn't comment, "Been there, done that."

Criminal

I have handled thousands of criminal cases from homicide to traffic offenses. Since I was a prosecutor for my first 14 years of practice, four of those as the District Attorney, I know how the prosecution thinks, prepares and presents its case. I believe I am a respected member of the legal profession, having appeared in the courts of Chester, Montgomery, Berks, Bucks and Delaware Counties including the minor judiciary well in excess of 8,000 times. When in court if I have something to say, I am confident it will be heard.

I am known to be relentless in my efforts to insure that my clients receive nothing less than the justice due them as required by the Constitutions of the United States and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. If I represent you, you can be assured that I will not only do everything in my power to help you with your immediate problem but also direct you on a path that will hopefully minimize your need for a criminal defense attorney in the future. My mind set is short and succinct: I believe if it can be done, I can do it.

If you believe you may be charged or have been charged with a criminal offense you need an experienced attorney to guide you through the maze of the criminal justice system. That path begins with this advice: If any law enforcement official attempts to question you be polite and pleasant. Provide whatever statistical information; such as: name, residence, height, eye color, that may be asked. Do not say anything about anything that could possibly relate to a criminal event. You have an absolute right to remain silent and anything you say could and likely will be used against you. Exercise this right and advise the questioner you would like to speak to an attorney. Remember, even a fish could avoid many perils if it kept its mouth shut.

Domestic

With the exception of the four years I served as Chester County's first full-time District Attorney in 300 years, I have been representing individuals in what is termed "family" or "domestic" matters.

Domestic litigation essentially falls into one or all of the following:

Divorce

Dissolution of the marriage;

Equitable Distribution of Marital Property

Could be, but is not necessarily, equal based on at least 13 criteria;

Spousal Support

Monthly sum paid by financially stronger to financially weaker while yet married;

Alimony Pendente Lite

If married but not eligible for spousal support the amount the financially stronger pays the financially weaker while the litigation is ongoing;

Alimony

If determined appropriate based on 17 criteria amount financially stronger pays to financially weaker after divorce;

Child Support

Normally the monthly sum the parent with fewer overnight visits per year with the parties' child or children pays to the party who has the child or children more often overnight;

Child Custody

Determination as to who has the child or children under 18 overnight more often in a given year;

Criteria: Best interest of the child(ren); not the parents;

Protection from Abuse

Action by which a party seeks court-ordered, up-to-36 months' exclusive use of the residence because of abuse by the other. Violation brings a fine up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail.

Individuals involved in family law issues will find them extremely involved, emotionally painful and financially draining. They need an experienced guide to help them through the intricacies of the Family Law maze. With 38 years practicing in the family law sector I am such a guide. After thousands of cases I can't say that I've seen every controversy that a dissolved relationship can produce but I can say if I haven't seen it before it may be a first occurrence.

Personal Injury

Products Liability

Wills and Estates

Areas of Law

  • Criminal
  • Domestic
  • Divorce
  • Equitable Distribution of Marital Property
  • Spousal Support
  • Alimony Pendente Lite
  • Wills and Estates.
  • Alimony
  • Child Support
  • Child Custody
  • Protection from Abuse
  • Personal Injury
  • Products Liability
 

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 10/22/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Principal

Firm Details

Year Established

1970

Firm Size

1

Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available

Contact Information

Firm Address

James R. Freeman, Esquire
606 Main Street,
Phoenixville, PA 19460
U.S.A.

Phone 1

484-928-0209

Phone 2

610-935-7744

Fax

610-935-7747

Office Information
 606 Main Street,
Phoenixville, PA 19460

Loading...

Office Hours
Monday
09:00 AM- 05:00 PM
Tuesday
09:00 AM- 05:00 PM
Wednesday
09:00 AM- 05:00 PM
Thursday
09:00 AM- 05:00 PM
Friday
09:00 AM- 05:00 PM


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.