Benjamin Lawrence

Attorney in Philadelphia, PA
Benjamin Lawrence practices in Consumer Collections, with a focus on the Consumer Collections (General) Group and is based in the Philadelphia office. He earned a B.A. cum laude in History from DeSales University in 2003 and a J.D. from The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law in 2008. A member of the American, Pennsylvania and Montgomery County Bar Associations, Benjamin is licensed in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and District of Columbia, and is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania). He is a member of the Magisterial District Justice Practice Committee and the Bankruptcy/Creditors and Debtors Rights Practice Committee of the Montgomery County Bar Association.
215.599.1500
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Consumer Collections
  • Consumer Collections

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Attorney

Admission Details

Admitted in 2008, New Jersey
U.S. District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
Pennsylvania
2012, District of Columbia

Law School Attended

The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law
Class of 2008
J.D.

University Attended

DeSales University
Class of 2003
B.A.
History, cum laude

Associations & Memberships

Bar AssociationsAmerican Bar Association
Pennsylvania Bar Association
Montgomery County Bar Association (Magisterial District Justice Practice Committee; Bankru... More

Contact Information

Phone

215.599.1500

Fax

215.599.1505

Email

Send email to Benjamin Lawrence


Office Information
Benjamin Lawrence
Attorney
 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 501,
Philadelphia, PA 19106-2611

Loading...

Logo
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.