Pamela Dru Sutton

Attorney in Panama City, FL
Associate Editor, Brooklyn Law Review, 1977-1978. Recipient, Attorney Pro Bono Award for the State of Florida from Office of Guardian Ad Litem, 1993. Author: "The Fundamental Right to Family Integrity and Its Role in New York Foster Care Adjudication," 44 Brooklyn L. R. 66, 1977. (cited as an authority in the Florida Bar publication Juvenile Law and Practice.)
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 3.9 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Divorce
  • Family Law
  • Child Custody
  • Elder Law
  • Civil Litigation
  • Real Estate
  • Estate Planning
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Wills
  • Probate
  • Criminal Defense


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Family Law, Personal Injury and General Practice
3.9 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 09/12/12
5.0 out of 5.0
I have known her for at least 30 years. I have litigated with her and against her. I have no doubt about my conclusions registered above.
Report abuse
Posted by a Govt. Counsel on 08/30/12
5.0 out of 5.0
She has assisted many clients very well.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 08/02/12
4.8 out of 5.0
Pam is very intelligent and an excellent attorney.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1979, New York and Florida
1980, U.S. Tax Court and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida
1982, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Law School Attended

Brooklyn Law School
Class of 1978

University Attended

Harvard University
Class of 1972
cum laude, in English

Birth Information

Born in 1950
New York, N.Y., March 9, 1950

Contact Information


850-785-7272 Call Now


Send email to Pamela Dru Sutton

Office Information
Pamela Dru Sutton
 116 East Fourth Street, P.O. Box 532,
Panama City, FL 32402


Stone & Sutton, P.A. (Panama City, Florida)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.