Robert H. Brogden, Esq.

Attorney in Ozark, AL
Phi Alpha Delta. Associate Editor, Cumberland-Samford Law Review, 1971-1972. Author, Comment: Taxability of Damages under Alabama's Wrongful Death Statute, 3 Cum-Sam L. Review 164 (1972).
Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5
  • Trial Practice
  • Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Family Law
  • Real Estate
  • Criminal Law
  • Driving While Intoxicated
  • Banking Law
  • Probate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody

Rating Not Shown
This lawyer has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by his or her clients.

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1972, Alabama
1973, Florida
1978, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Alabama
1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Cumberland School of Law of Samford University
    Class of 1972

    University Attended

    Auburn University
    Class of 1967

    Birth Information

    Born in 1945
    Andalusia, Alabama, August 12, 1945


    1st Lt., U.S. Army, 1968-1969, Vietnam Veteran

    Associations & Memberships

    Dale County Bar Association (President, 1984-1985); Alabama State Bar (Bar Commissioner, 33rd Judicial Circuit; Member, Panel I Disciplinary Board); The Florida Bar; Alabama Trial Lawye... More

    Contact Information


    334-774-5171 Call Now




    Send email to Robert H. Brogden, Esq.

    Social Networking

    Office Information
    Robert H. Brogden, Esq.
     164 East College Street, P.O. Box 1007,
    Ozark, AL 36360-1007


    Brogden Law Firm, LLC (Ozark, Alabama)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.