Mark A. Nelson

Attorney in Oxnard, CA
Elected Member and President, Board of Trustees, Mesa Union School District, 1996 and 2000. Founding Director and President, Collaborative Family Law Professionals, Ventura Courts, 2003.
805-751-6482
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

     

    Overall Client Rating

    4.9 out of 5.0

    Communication Ability
    4.9
    Responsiveness
    4.9
    Quality of Service
    5.0
    Value for Money
    4.8

    • Data based on 11 reviews
    • Last reviewed on 06/11/11
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
    Are you a former client?  Submit a review

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Partner

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1981, California, U.S. District Court, Central and Southern Districts of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

    Credit Cards Accepted
    Mastercard
    Visa
    Law School Attended

    University of Southern California
    Class of 1981
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of California at Los Angeles
    Class of 1977
    B.A.

    Associations & Memberships

    Ventura County Bar Association (Member and Section Chair, Board of Directors, 1985-1986; President, Family Law Section, 2003).

    Certifications

    (Certified Specialist, Family Law, The State Bar of California Board Of Legal Specialization)

    Contact Information

    Phone

    805-604-4100 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to Mark A. Nelson


    Office Information
    Mark A. Nelson
    Partner
     300 Esplanade Drive, Suite 1170,
    Oxnard, CA 93036

    Loading...

    Logo
    Nelson Comis Kettle & Kinney LLP (Oxnard, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.