A. Chance Wilkinson

Attorney in Oxford, NC
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Bankruptcy
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 7
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 13
  • Civil Practice
  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Defense
  • Capital Offenses
  • Living Wills
  • Felonies
  • Misdemeanors
  • Traffic Violations
  • General Practice
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Probate
  • Real Estate
  • Wills


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Bankruptcy, Constitutional Law and Contracts
4.5 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 04/08/14
Posted by a Consumer on 04/08/14
5.0 out of 5.0
I have employed the services of Mr. Wilkinson countless number of times since being referred to him many years ago. First for a speeding ticket (and a few more) and since then for other legal actions such as home mortgage, minor Constitutional law, power of attorney, and more. Chance provides excellent counseling. He is constantly professional, communicative, prompt, etc. I highly recommend.

[BTW - I gave all 5's, since 4.5 not an option - nobody is perfect :-) ]
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1995, North Carolina
2004, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina

Law School Attended

Wake Forest University School of Law
Class of 1995

University Attended

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Class of 1992
History, with honors

Featured Lawyers

Royster, Cross & Hensley, LLP
Oxford, U.S.A.
919-939-2365 | Email
Client Rating

1.2 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

Hopper, Hicks & Wrenn, PLLC
Oxford, U.S.A.
919-939-2331 | Email
Client Rating

1.2 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.