| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerToday's Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer ArchiveTopic Schedule |
| Legal Forms & DocumentsState Law and AgenciesU.S. ConstitutionFederal Courts & LawsU.S. Small Claims CourtFederal Government AgenciesLegal DictionaryFree Case Law Research |
I've been paying careful attention to the health care debate, because I'm self-employed. Among other things, that means I buy my own health insurance policy. My current plan has some shortcomings, so I'm hoping that I'll eventually have a few more options when it comes to health insurance policies.
The last time I applied for a new insurance policy, I didn't read all of the fine print on the application form. I was surprised, a few weeks later, when the insurance company called me with some questions.
The application form I completed had asked me to list all prescription drugs I'd taken over the last five years. Now, I don't know about you, but I've had some run-of-the-mill health problems over the years, so I listed all of the drugs I remember taking. It turns out that when I'd signed the application form, I'd given the insurance company permission to access my health records, including my prescription drugs records. They called me to ask about some of the things I'd accidentally left off of the list, like the antibiotic my doctor recommended I carry with me in case I got sick on a trip to Africa. And the pain killer I'd used after minor out-patient surgery.
I was surprised that I'd forgotten ever having received these drugs, but I was more surprised that there was a list in some database that itemized every prescription drug I'd ever taken. The experience gave me a crash course in medical privacy, but I also learned that there is a lot of medical information being collected about every one of us that we may not even realize exists.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, commonly known as HIPAA, gives each one of us the right to keep our health information private. HIPAA, along with some state laws, affect how our health information can be used or shared.
What Are Your Rights?Health care providers and health insurers who are required to follow HIPAA must comply with your right to:
While you must give your written permission before your health information is used by or shared with your employer, mental health counselors or for marketing purposes, the information can be used and shared without your permission:
HIPAA requires the following health and medical information be protected from unauthorized use or sharing:
A number of people and entities are required to protect your health information and comply with HIPAA. These include:
HIPAA can be a tricky law. For example, I wasn't happy to learn that, as part of my application for health insurance, the insurance company could pull all of my old medical records. Then I went back to read the fine print on the application I'd signed. It said that if I refused to release my medical records, they would automatically decline my application. In my case, I had to decide which was more valuable to me: my medical privacy or health insurance. If you're faced with a medical privacy issue, it's vital to know your rights under HIPAA.
Related Links:
I'll be the first to admit it: I'm a wimp. As a child, I dreaded the month of August, because that meant it was time for my back-to-school doctor's appointment. And a doctor's appointment inevitably meant that I needed to get shots. I'm a bit ashamed to admit it, but as a kid I would cry and scream when I saw the nurse approaching with a needle. (Today I'm a bit better behaved.)
August is National Immunization Awareness Month. If you have children who have are already back in school or will be heading to school soon, you've probably given some recent thought to doctors' appointments, dental check-ups and routine vaccines.
The fact is, immunizations are a controversial topic in this country. Advocates of immunization argue that vaccines are a safe, necessary way to protect the public health. Other people, however, object on religious grounds or question the safety and effectiveness of immunizations.
Immunizing School-Aged ChildrenEvery state requires children to be immunized before entering school. Most states require a child's parents or guardian to provide written proof, signed by a healthcare provider, that the child is up to date on the required vaccines. Unless there is a religious objection to vaccination or a health condition that precludes vaccination, unvaccinated children are not permitted to attend school.
Most states require that children in school be vaccinated against:
Some states also require the varicella (chicken pox) vaccine.
Immunization ExemptionsEvery state except West Virginia and Mississippi allow parents with religious objections to immunization to apply for an exemption for their child from the state's immunization requirements.
Twenty states allow parents who have a philosophical objection to immunization to apply for an exemption. These states are:
All states allow for children with compromised immune systems, allergies to vaccine ingredients and other chronic or severe illnesses to receive a medical exemption from immunizations.
If you have a religious or philosophical objection to immunizing your child, you'll need to supply an affidavit to the school testifying to that fact. If the school refuses to honor your objection, in most cases a letter from your lawyer that explains your legal right to object should solve the problem. In extreme situations, parents have fought their local school districts in court to gain or uphold their right to keep their child from being vaccinated.
Immunization Information & RisksFederal law requires that parents, guardians or patients be given written information about the risks and benefits of vaccination before administering the vaccine. In addition, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act requires all healthcare providers in the United States to provide copies of a Vaccine Information Statement before administering any vaccines for diphtheria, Haemophilus influenza type b, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis, pneumococcal conjugate, polio, tetanus or varicella.
In the 1980s, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 in response to the growing number of lawsuits filed against vaccine manufacturers. The law is aimed at stabilizing U.S. vaccine supplies while also preserving vaccine companies' assets for research into safer vaccines.
The Act also established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to compensate victims or families of victims injured by certain childhood vaccines. The VICP, funded by a 75 cent tax on each vaccination given, is a "no fault" system designed to compensate the injured while protecting healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits.
Under the VICP, an individual or a parent or guardian of an individual injured by a covered vaccine, or the legal representative of the estate of a person who may have been killed by a vaccine, may file a claim, called a petition, for compensation.
Related Links:
It sometimes seems that friends and family are constantly in and out of doctor's offices and hospitals. We once went six months straight with a different friend in the hospital each month. Hospitals are amazing places staffed by people whose job it is to help you get better. Unfortunately, that doesn't always happen. Sometimes people are beyond help. Worse yet, sometimes the actions or inactions of the doctors or nurses can unnecessarily injure or kill a patient. This happened to a friend of mine almost five years ago. She is still paying off the medical bills from her hospitalization despite the fact that her doctor committed medical malpractice and she came within a few hours of dying. So, what's the problem, why is she paying off the bills, including the fees of the doctor that nearly killed her? None of the attorneys she spoke to would take her case. Why? Because she lived.
That's right. If she had died they would have been happy to help her husband go after the people responsible, but because she lived they felt the damage wasn't catastrophic enough. Apparently weeks in the hospital, hundreds of thousands of dollars of medical bills that her insurance didn't cover, and inability to work for about a year wasn't catastrophic. It was incomprehensible to me that medical professionals nearly killed her and then legal professionals did nothing to right the wrong.
I've done some research and discovered that my friend isn't the only one who has been left out in the cold. It turns out one of the reasons attorneys are so picky about the cases they accept is that it is very hard to win a medical malpractice case. The things an attorney will consider in taking your case are: liability, damages, and who would pay the damages. If you think you have a potential medical malpractice claim, here are some things you should consider in deciding what to do next.
Do you live in a state that requires you to first try to work things out through mediation or arbitration? The process can vary from state to state so you may want to ask a legal professional in your state what to expect.
How long ago did this happen? While there can be variants in different states' statutes of limitations, if what happened was over two years ago you may find it hard to bring your claim now. Seek the advice of a lawyer on this for your state's particular rules and any factors that may extend the time you have to bring suit.
Was your doctor negligent? Negligence can come in many forms. Common ones include: misdiagnosing a problem, failure to treat a problem correctly, giving the wrong medication, and failing to warn you of the risks of surgery or other procedures. Of course, even if your doctor did misdiagnose you, that doesn't automatically mean you can take him to court and win. The question then becomes was that a common enough misdiagnosis that other doctors would have made the same mistake? That leads to the next question.
How would your doctor's actions compare to those of other doctors? If the average practitioner would have done the exact same thing, you're probably not going to be able to win a lawsuit. Your doctor's actions have to be judged in light of a standard of care observed by doctors. This guarantees that you can't go after a doctor just because he isn't on the cutting edge of research or number one in his field. If your doctor's actions were in line with accepted medical practice, then he's probably covered. However, if other doctors are surprised or perplexed by the actions of the one who caused your injury, you might be able to bring a case against him.
What damages did you suffer? This is another one of those fuzzy areas. Of course, some damages such as medical bills are obvious. However, you also need to think in terms of loss of ability, pain and suffering and what the short and long term effects will be. What makes this difficult is that this varies greatly from person to person. For example, loss of a toe for a professional dancer could be much more catastrophic than for a banker. The physical marring and the loss of balance could negatively impact a dancer's work and income whereas a banker should be able to do his work just fine without the toe.
There are a lot of factors that affect a medical malpractice case. If you think you have one, seek out an attorney as soon as possible. Keep in mind the above list so you know what to ask and what to expect from the meeting. Don't be too shocked if the attorney refuses to take your case. Do seek out a second opinion, just like you would from a doctor! However, if multiple attorneys tell you the same thing then the best thing you can do for yourself is let it go. Work on recovering physically and financially as fast as you can. A lawyer can help you work out the details of your medical financial obligations and how to best handle them. The important thing is to do what you can to minimize the impact and get on with the rest of your life and do your best to thrive, not just survive!
Related Links:
Disclaimer: The information provided on Lawyers.com is not legal advice, Lawyers.com is not a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or should be formed by use of the site. The attorney listings on Lawyers.com are paid attorney advertisements and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by Lawyers.com or any approved or authorized lawyer referral service. Your access to and use of this site is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

