Terry C. Young

Attorney in Orlando, FL
Terry Young has tried over 50 jury trials to verdict and more than 200 non-jury trials. He has more than 30 years of experience - in local, state and Federal courts - ranging from disputes over United States presidential elections to multi-national bet-the-company litigation, from high profile divorces to multi-million-dollar personal injury cases, from complex contract disputes to first amendment defenses.

Whether a public persona or a private family, a major corporation or a fledgling new venture, Terry represents both plaintiffs and defendants, from counseling through trial and appeal. While Terry advocates on behalf of his clients in court, he is a firm believer in dispute resolution whenever appropriate. Most importantly, whether in arbitration, mediation, divorce, or trial, or negotiating a private settlement, he has the utmost regard for clients' confidentiality, privacy and ultimate objectives.

Sometimes those objectives are to minimize costs - even in the case of a high-profile divorce. Terry has represented a number of public figures in family law matters:

Recognition
•Martindale-Hubbell Rating: AV
•Listed in Best Lawyers in America 2003-2015
•The Best of the Bar Orlando Business Journal
•Florida's Top Lawyers Florida Monthly Magazine
•Florida Legal Elite Florida Trend Magazine 2011-2014
•Selected as Top 100 Attorney by Florida Super Lawyers 2006
•Selection for inclusion in 2006-2009, 2011-2014 Florida Super Lawyers
•Listed in Chambers USA: 2011-2014

Community Activities
•American Board of Trial Advocates, past President and Chairman of the Membership Committee, Charter Member
•Florida ABOTA, past President and past Treasurer, current Board of Directors
•Florida Bar Grievance Committee, past Chair
•Federal Grievance past Chair, Orlando Division, Middle District of Florida
•Heart of Florida United Way's Seagrave House, former Director
•Heart of Florida United Way Capital Fund Committee
•University Club, past Board Member and President

Related Articles
•If You Were Previously Divorced, or are in the Process of Becoming Divorced, it is Time to Review Your and/or Your Prior Spouse's Beneficiary Designations
•President Obama Signs America Invents Act into Law
•New Changes in Florida's Child Support Laws

Related Blogs
•Lowndes LEAP
•Central Florida Divorce Blog

Related Press Releases
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Lawyers Named Florida Super Lawyers and Rising Stars for 2014
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A. Named Among Top Firms in Chambers USA 2014
•Best Lawyers in America Names Forty-Two Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor, & Reed Attorneys to the 2014 List
•Florida Trend Magazine Recognizes Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed as Legal Elite
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Lawyers Named to 2013 Florida Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Attorneys and Practice Areas Ranked in Chambers USA 2013 Directory
•Forty-two Lowndes Drosdick Doster Kantor & Reed Attorneys Named to 2013 Best Lawyers in America
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A. Attorneys Honored as 2012 Legal Elite by Florida Trend Magazine
•Chambers USA 2012 Recognizes Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Attorneys and Practices
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Lawyers Named Florida Super Lawyers and Rising Stars for 2012
•Thirty-Nine Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Attorneys Named to 2012 Best Lawyers in America
•Fifteen Firm Attorneys Named 2011 Florida Legal Elite
•Chambers USA Recognizes Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Attorneys and Practices
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Lawyers Named Florida Super Lawyers and Rising Stars for 2011
•Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Attorneys Recognized As Orlando's Best Lawyers 2011

Related Media Coverage
•Inside the list: Which areas of litigation are growing most?
•In new alimony bill, wealthy, cheating men could pay less
•Four of Central Florida's most sought-after attorneys
•BUSTED. Social media air dirty laundry, fuel divorce, custody fights

Related Videos
•What to Expect in the Courtroom

407-418-6347
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Child Support and Alimony
  • Collaborative Law and Mediation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Copyright Infringement Litigation
  • Copyright Licensing
  • Custody
  • Time-sharing
  • Parenting Plans
  • and Relocation
  • Divorce
  • Family & Marital Law
  • Trademark Searches and Filing
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Intellectual Property Services Group
  • Litigation & Trial Practice
  • Patent Infringement Litigation
  • Paternity
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Prenuptial & Postnuptial Agreements
  • Private Wealth Services
  • Products Liability
  • Trade Secrets
  • Trademark Infringement Litigation

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Shareholder

Admission Details

Admitted in 1976, Florida

Law School Attended

University of Florida College of Law
Class of 1975
J.D.
with honors

University Attended

University of Florida
Class of 1973
B.S.
with high honors

Associations & Memberships

Professional Certifications, Memberships and Activities
•Florida Justice Association
•American Justice Association
•Defense Research Institute
... More

Contact Information

Phone

407-418-6347

Fax

407-843-4444

Email

Send email to Terry C. Young


Office Information
Terry C. Young
Shareholder
 215 North Eola Drive,
Orlando, FL 32801

Loading...

Logo
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed Professional Association (Orlando, Florida)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.