N. James Turner LinkedIn

Attorney in Orlando, FL
Delta Theta Phi; Phi Kappa Phi. Author: Comment, "Qualified Pension and Profit Sharing Plans: Integration with Social Security," 29, U. Miami L. Rev. 119, 1974; The Monthly Digest of Tax Articles 58, 1976; "Consequences of Instructing Deponents Not To Answer," Florida Bar Journal, Vol. 39, April, 1991; "Employer Liability for Acts of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Respondent Superior and Beyond," Florida Bar Journal, 41, 1994; "The Perils of (Reporting and) Not Reporting Sexual Harassment," Florida Bar Journal, December, 1997; "Successfully Defending Employees in Non-Compete and Trade Secret Litigation," Florida Bar Journal, Vol. 78, April 2004; Article, "Prudential Told to Pay Broker in Fraud Case" describes a noteworthy decision, New York Times. Volunteer: Transition House Inc., Kissimmee, Florida; Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida, Inc.; Legal Aid Society of the Orange County Bar Association; Friends of the Orlando Philharmonic.
877-629-6535
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5
  • Covenants Not To Compete
  • Employee Rights
  • Employment Contracts
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Employment Law
  • Fair Labor Standards
  • Family and Medical Leave Act
  • Minimum Wage Law
  • Noncompete Litigation
  • Restrictive Covenants
  • Retaliatory Discharge
  • Student Loans
  • Wage and Hour Law
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Debt Harassment
  • Collection Harassment
  • Consumer Law
  • Consumer Credit Compliance
  • Consumer Rights
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • Fair Debt Collection
  • Bankruptcy Litigation
  • Debt Relief

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1975, Florida
1976, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
1981, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida and U.S. Supreme Court
1982, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    University of Miami School of Law
    Class of 1975
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University of Miami School of Law
    Class of 1978
    LL.M.

    University Attended

    Bentley College
    Class of 1972
    B.S.
    with highest honors

    Languages

    Spanish (elementary)

    Military

    Artillery, U.S. Army, 1964-1966; Vietnam Era Veteran; National Defense Service Medal, Honorable Discharge

    Associations & Memberships

    Osceola and Orange County (Former Chair, Labor and Employment Law Section) Bar Associations; The Florida Bar (Member, Labor and Employment Law Section); Hispanic Bar Association of Orange Count... More

    Representative Cases

    Molina v. South Florida Exp. Bankserv, Inc., 420 F. Supp. 2d 1276 - Dist. Court, MD Florida 2006Hinton v. Supervision, 942 So. 2d 986 - Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 5th Dist., 2006.

    Hobbies & Interests

    photography, hiking, biking, travelling

    Contact Information

    Phone

    888-877-5103 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to N. James Turner

    Social Networking



    Office Information
    N. James Turner
    Member
     37 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 500,
    Orlando, FL 32801

    Loading...

    Logo
    Law Offices of N. James Turner (Orlando, Florida)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.