James Martin Davis

Attorney in Omaha, NE
James Martin Davis focuses his practice on criminal defense matters in both state and federal courts, and also represents plaintiffs in serious personal injury and wrongful death actions. For information regarding Mr. Davis’ areas of expertise, please see the Practice Areas Overview page.

With a legal career spanning over 35 years, and extensive trial experience including over 150 jury trials, Mr. Davis provides creative and effective legal representation to his clients. In recognition of his work and standing in the legal community, Mr. Davis has attained the highest possible peer-review rating of “AV” from Martindale-Hubbell, the national directory of attorneys, indicating preeminent legal ability and the highest ethical standards. He is Certified as a Criminal Trial Specialist and a Certified Civil Trial Specialist by the National Board of Trial Advocacy, and has been selected to the American Trial Lawyers Top 100 Lawyers and as a Great Plains Super Lawyer.

Mr. Davis received his Juris Doctor degree from Indiana University School of Law following military service where he served as a decorated combat soldier for the United States Army in Vietnam. As a result of his service, he received a Battlefield Commission as a Second Lieutenant. His biography also includes serving as Commissioner of the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission, 1977-1982; Special Agent, U.S. Secret Service, 1970-1973; and Attorney-in-Charge, Organized Crime and Anti-Corruption Strike Force, Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana, 1975-1976. Mr. Davis was also a Democratic Candidate for U.S. Congress in 1996.

Mr. Davis was admitted to practice in the State of Nebraska in 1975 and is also admitted to appear before the U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska; 1976, Indiana State Bar and U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit; 1982, U.S. Tax Court; 1983, U.S. Supreme Court; 1989, Colorado State Bar and U.S. Claims Court; 1992, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; 1997, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit; 2012, Iowa State Bar. His publications include Raids: A Guide to Planning, Coordinating and Executing Searches and Arrests, Charles Thomas Publishers; 1982; "Impeachment By Prior Inconsistent Statements," Trial Magazine; March, 1989; "Self-Control: The Forgotten Rule of Cross-Examination," Trial Magazine; October, 1989; and "Preparing Witnesses for Cross-Examination," Trial Magazine.

An active member of the community, Mr. Davis is a member of the Nebraska State (Member, House of Delegates); Iowa State, Indiana State, Colorado State, and American (Member, Criminal Justice Section) Bar Associations; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Nebraska Criminal Defense Attorneys Association (Past President); Phi Alpha Theta; and Delta Theta Phi.
402-341-9900
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Federal and State Criminal Law
  • Federal and State Drug Crimes and Offenses
  • Felonies
  • Homicides and Assaults
  • Sexual Assaults
  • White Collar Crimes
  • Internet Crimes
  • Military Law and Court Martial
  • Criminal Immigration Cases
  • Tax Violations
  • Misdemeanors
  • DUI/DWI
  • Civil Litigation
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Wrongful Death
  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries

 

Overall Client Rating

in Appellate Practice and Criminal Law
3.6 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.5
Responsiveness
3.5
Quality of Service
3.8
Value for Money
3.8

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 07/03/12
Posted by a Consumer on 07/03/12
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
JMD is the best criminal defense litigator in the Omaha area. Very sharp, personable, and professional. Well worth every penny.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 04/19/12
1.0 out of 5.0
Hired Davis for Appellate practice.He had his Associates write the brief and argue the case before the Appellate Court. I lost my appeal because the brief filed by his office was not professionally written. They failed to bring to the courts attention all arguments that could be considered on direct appeal. I paid a lot of money to have a professionally drafted brief filed and argued on my behalf by James Martin Davis.I wasted my money. I would not recommend this attorney and his staff to anyone
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Owner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1975, Nebraska State Bar, and U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska
1976, Indiana State Bar, and U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
1982, U.S. Tax Court
1983, U.S. Supreme Court
1989, Colorado State Bar, and U.S. Claims Court
1992, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
1997, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
2012, Iowa State Bar

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa


Also accepts Other
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Indiana University of Law
    Class of 1975
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of Nebraska at Lincoln
    Class of 1967
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1945
    Omaha, Nebraska, November 30, 1945

    Languages

    Spanish

    Military

    2nd Lt., U.S. Army, 1968-1970; Member, National Order of Battlefield Commissions

    Associations & Memberships

    Nebraska State (Member, House of Delegates), Iowa State, Indiana State, Colorado State, and American (Member, Criminal Justice Section) Bar Associations; National Association of Criminal Def... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    402-341-9900 Call Now

    Fax

    402-341-8144

    Email

    Send email to James Martin Davis


    Office Information
    James Martin Davis
    Owner
    Farnam Plaza Building 1623 Farnam Street, Suite 500,
    Omaha, NE 68102

    Loading...

    Logo
    James Martin Davis Law Office (Omaha, Nebraska)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.