Kate Corrigan

Attorney in Newport Beach, CA
Former Prosecutor, Deputy District Attorney, Orange County, 1989-1995. Narcotic Enforcement Team Asset Forfeiture Unit, 1994-1995. Listed, Martindale-Hubbell's Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers. CJA Panel, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division. President of Orange County Criminal Defense Bar Association (Dec. 2010-2011); Secretary (2010); Board Member of Federal Bar Association/OC Chapter (2009-2010) (Secretary 2011); Speaker: NACDL - Street Crimes - Gangs and RICO (2010); Moderator for OCCDBA Panels; Moderator for FBA/OCCDBA Criminal Law Panel (Nov. 2010); Panelist - Southern Western Law School Law review Symposium on Criminal Law and Punishment Issues (2010); CJA Steering Committee (CDC) (2011); Central District CJA Trial Panel Training - RICO - Sept., 2010); Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Winning Strategies Conference: (RICO Presentations, Federal Complex Litigation: Portland, Oregon, May 7-9, 2009; Charleston, SC, February 5-7, 2009; Los Angeles, CA, September 4-6, 2008; San Diego, CA, June 8-10, 2006); (Gang Presentations, Federal Criminal Defense: Albuquerque, NM, February 8-10, 2007); (Multi-Track-Federal Criminal Defense Trial Strategy Conference, Baltimore, MD, September 6-8, 2007; Chicago, IL, September 2009-TBA); Beach Cities Service League, Issues Juveniles Face in Today's Society, 2008; NCL, Issues Facing Young Women in Today's Society, 2009. Panelist, The Art of War Stories: Litigation Lessons Learned, 2007. Guest Speaker: Criminal Law Society, Western State Law School, 2009; Internet and Computer Crimes for Instructor Wayne Gross, Chapman Law School. Ethics Panelist, West Orange County Bar Association, 2005. Co-Chair of FBA/OC Chapter, Behind the Books and Bars, An Inside Look at Our Federal Judges and their Courthouse, 2009. Co-Chair, FBA Criminal Practice Seminar, 2009-TBA. From Backpacks to Briefcases, Whittier Law School, 2009.
949-251-0330
Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

White Collar CrimeCriminal DefenseDrugs and Narcotics
White Collar Crime
40%
Criminal Defense
30%
Drugs and Narcotics
30%

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1987, California, U.S. District Court, Central, Northern, Eastern and Southern Districts of California, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
1998, Massachusetts (Inactive)

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of London
    Class of 1986
    International Law Studies

    Pepperdine University School of Law
    Class of 1987
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of California at Irvine
    Class of 1984
    B.A.
    Political Science

    Languages

    French

    Associations & Memberships

    Founding Board Member of the Orange County Criminal Bar Association(President, Dec. 2010-2011) (Secretary, 2009-2011); Federal Bar Association Orange County Chapter (Secretary, 2011); Orange Coun... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    949-251-0330

    Fax

    949-251-1181

    Mobile

    949-633-0300

    Email

    Send email to Kate Corrigan


    Office Information
    Kate Corrigan
    Member
     4100 Newport Place, Suite 550,
    Newport Beach, CA 92660

    Loading...

    Logo
    Corrigan & Welbourn, APLC (Newport Beach, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.