Thomas R. Maeglin

Attorney in New York, NY
Mr. Maeglin's practice is focused upon first- and third-party insurance coverage litigation, subrogation and property damage defense, in both state and federal courts. He has represented insurers in declaratory judgment actions regarding construction-related property damage and defect, with particular experience related to excavation, underpinning and demolition claims, as well as fire, water intrusion, and ruptured pipe losses. He has also represented parties seeking and defending against claims for additional insured coverage under commercial general liability policies, and has won summary judgment on rescission, trigger of coverage and a range of policy conditions and exclusions. His work has included coverage opinions on a wide range of issues arising from commercial property, business interruption, commercial general liability, builders risk, truckers liability, and professional liability policies; examinations under oath; and claim investigation. His clients include admitted and surplus lines insurers.

Tom has given presentations on a range of property and liability insurance-related topics at seminars presented by the New York State Bar Association and Property & Liability Resource Bureau.

Hailing originally from the State of Iowa, Tom received his Bachelor's degree from the University of Chicago in 1990. He went on to earn a joint Masters of Business Administration and Juris Doctor from the Fordham University Graduate School of Business and School of Law in 2003.

Notable Cases:
Travelers Indemnity Co. a/s/o Acme Architectural Products Inc. v. AA Kitchen Cabinet & Stone Supply, Inc. and Mutual Gas & Energy Corp., 2013 NY Slip Op 3322 (2nd Dep't 2013)(waiver of subrogation provision bars claim for fire damage).

New York Open Center, Inc. v. Empire Water Holdings, LLC and Seneca Insurance Co., 25 Misc.3d 1220 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 2009)(granting summary judgment in favor of insurer where damage to plaintiff's property was not the result of a covered cause of loss).

347-834-8265
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • General Liability
  • Insurance Coverage
  • First-Party and Third-Party Property Defense

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 2004, New York
2005, U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Fordham University School of Law
    Class of 2003
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of Chicago
    Class of 1990
    B.A.

    Fordham University Graduate School of Business Administration
    Class of 2003
    M.B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1967
    Muscatine, Iowa, June 15, 1967

    Representative Cases

    Notable Cases; Waiver of subrogation provision bars claim for fire loss, and language in lease rider not in conflict: Appellate Division affirms summary judgment for tenant ; Court rejects investor's suit against insurer of debtor: Second mortgagee's complaint for breach of contract against insurer fails based upon documentary evidence

    Contact Information

    Phone

    (212) 422-1200 Ext 230

    Email

    Send email to Thomas R. Maeglin


    Office Information
    Thomas R. Maeglin
    Partner
     One Battery Park Plaza, 4th Floor,
    New York, NY 10004

    Loading...

    Logo
    Abrams, Gorelick, Friedman & Jacobson, LLP (New York, New York)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.