Sarah Diane McShea

Attorney in New York, NY
Chief, Public Corruption Bureau, Kings County District Attorney's Office, 1990-1993. Deputy Chief Counsel and Staff Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, First Department, 1980-1989. Adjunct Professor, Fordham University School of Law, 2008-2009; Brooklyn Law School, 2001-2007; Columbia University School of Law, 1989-1992. Editorial Board, ABA/BNA Lawyers' Manual on Professional Conduct, 1994—. Trustee, New York State Lawyer Assistance Trust, 2008—2013.
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
  • Attorney Fee Disputes
  • Sanctions Litigation
  • Attorney Discipline
  • Bar Admissions


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1979, Massachusetts
1980, New York and U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
1989, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York

Law School Attended

Boston University
Class of 1979

University Attended

Yale University
Class of 1975

Associations & Memberships

American Bar Association, Center for Professional Responsibility; New York State Bar Association (Chair, Law Practice Continuity, 2006-2009). Co-Chair, Professional Discipline, 2007-2009); M... More

Contact Information




Send email to Sarah Diane McShea

Office Information
Sarah Diane McShea
 26 Broadway, 18th Floor,
New York, NY 10004-1703


Law Offices of Sarah Diane McShea (New York, New York)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.