Sanford Heisler, LLP

Law Firm in New York, NY

About This Firm

Sanford Heisler specializes in civil rights and general public interest cases, representing plaintiffs with employment discrimination, labor and wage violations, predatory lending, whistleblower, consumer fraud, and other claims. Along with an expertise in class actions, Sanford Heisler also represents select individuals and has developed a particular expertise in the representation of executives in employment disputes.

Sanford Heisler recently secured the largest jury award in an employment discrimination case, winning more than $250 million dollars for 5,600 female employees at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Novartis was found guilty of sex discrimination against women in pay, promotions, and pregnancy. Sanford Heisler settled the matter not long after and its clients are receiving millions of dollars in lump-sum payouts. In addition, Novartis is making significant changes to its policies and procedures that prevent gender discrimination in its workplace.

Sanford Heisler also served as Lead Counsel in a wage and hour case against Novartis, which recently settled for $99 million. Sanford Heisler represented current and former Novartis Sales Representatives who were not paid overtime wages. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the employees—with the backing of the Department of Labor. The U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Second Circuit decision to stand.

Sanford Heisler is able to secure wins like Novartis and to otherwise provide an unparalleled level of client service because of the quality of our team. Indeed, we believe no other firm offers a similar concentration of talent. Our attorneys have graduated from the nation's top law schools, clerked for judges throughout the United States, and amassed extensive experience litigating cases that have earned tens of millions of dollars for our clients.

However, at Sanford Heisler, we know that injustice often harms the people who can least afford it. We handle many cases on a contingency fee basis, which means that our compensation is a percentage of the recovered amount, or nothing if a recovery isn't won. By charging for our work on a contingency-only basis, Sanford Heisler provides each client with equal access to expert legal representation, regardless of his or her financial circumstances.

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Mass Torts
  • Complex Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Products Liability
  • Personal Injury.

Overall Client Rating

3.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 03/13/13
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Of Counsel
Founding Partner
Senior Counsel
Senior Counsel
Senior Counsel
Senior Counsel
Senior Counsel
Senior Litigation Counsel
Senior Litigation Counsel

Firm Details

Year Established


Contact Information

Firm Address

Sanford Heisler, LLP
1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor,
New York, NY 10019






Send email to Sanford Heisler, LLP

Office Information
 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor,
New York, NY 10019


Office Hours
09:30 AM- 06:30 PM
09:30 AM- 06:30 PM
09:30 AM- 06:30 PM
09:30 AM- 06:30 PM
09:30 AM- 06:30 PM
09:30 AM- 06:30 PM
09:30 AM- 06:30 PM

Other Offices
Washington Office
1666 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 300 Washington, District of Columbia
San Francisco Office
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206 San Francisco, California
Washington, D.C. Office: 1666 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 300. Telephone: 202-742-7777. Fax: 202-742-7776.
San Francisco, California Office: 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1206. Telephone: 415-391-6900. Fax: 415-391-6901

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.