Paul H. Silverman

Attorney in New York, NY

Paul H. Silverman, concentrates on corporate reorganization, commercial litigation, creditors' & debtors' domestic and foreign cross-border strategies and forensic investigations. Paul has tried civil and criminal cases to conclusion. He serves as U.S. legal advisor to court appointed foreign court appointed administrators and by invitation, he has lectured in the U.S. and in Europe.

Mr. Silverman's government service includes: Assistant in the Office of the U.S. Attorney General (O.D.A.L.E.), Assistant U.S. Attorney, S.D.N.Y. (criminal and civil divisions, tax and bankruptcy units). He lectured at the N.Y. State, as well as at the American, Bar Association's Annual Meetings, at the Law and Finance Graduate Program (Frankfurt), and at the E.U. Commission on State Aid recovery (Belgium). Mr. Silverman spoke on comparative law at the C.S. Beck publisher's Annual German National Insolvency Conference (Frankfurt), and also to financial restructuring professionals in Paris, Madrid, Prague, Helskinki & throughout Germany.

Paul served as federal law clerk to Honorable Thomas Croake, Southern District of New York, graduated from Fordham Law School in New York (Fordham Law review). He received his B.A. degree in Philosophy and in History from Dickinson College in Carlisle, PA, a member of Omicron Delta Kappa, national leadership honorary society, and president of Alpha Psi Omega, national dramatic honorary society. He is a long standing member of the N.Y. State Bar Association, now Business Section Chair and past Bankruptcy Committee Chairperson, a member of the International Bar and of the City Bar Banking and the Bankruptcy Committee. Paul serves as budget committee chair, Village of Larchmont, NY, former president of his synagogue and Horseshoe Harbor Yacht Club secretary, where he and his wife kayak.

Representative Experience: Mr. Silverman has represented debtors, creditors' committees, and creditors, authored confirmed plans providing creditor distributions, and purchaser's of distressed assets as well as successfully conducted out-of-court work-out arrangements. As to litigation, he resolved, through pre-trial mediation, a complex and sensitive Federal Court defense in which the well-known corporate client was very grateful. He created unique intertwined trust features assisting resolution of the $2+ billion Dalkon Shield mass tort bankruptcy court reorganization plan and was counsel in Enron, World Com, Daewoo, AgfaPhoto, Quimonda and Edscha cases. Paul counsels German receivers of global mfg., distribution, and finance companies as to U.S. law. Paul timely obtained a U.S. injunction enabling Multicanal, a cable provider, to reorganize in Argentina and protected Daewoo's Korean Receiver's U.S. interests. Further, Paul succeeded in an international fraud investigation and trial with a $10+ million U.K. client asset recovery


-International Bar Association

-Federal Bar Council

-New York State Bar Association, Business Section

-New York City Bar Association

(212) 803-1317
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Bankruptcy Law
  • International Law
  • Litigation


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1972, New York

Law School Attended

Fordham University School of Law
Class of 1971

University Attended

Dickinson College
Class of 1968

Contact Information


(212) 803-1317


(212) 448-0066


Send email to Paul H. Silverman

Office Information
Paul H. Silverman
 260 Madison Avenue,
New York, NY 10016


McLaughlin & Stern, LLP (New York, New York)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.