Patricia Ann Grant LinkedIn

Attorney in New York, NY
212-308-2200

Areas of Law

  • Matrimonial Law
  • Family Law
  • Divorce Litigation
  • Spousal Support
  • Child Support
  • Child Custody
  • Visitation Rights
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Family Court Proceedings
  • Pre-Nuptial and Post-Nuptial Agreements

 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
1.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Value for Money
1.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 09/28/13
Posted by a Consumer on 09/28/13
1.0 out of 5.0
I paid her to appear in court and she didn't go but kept the money saying she had to use it on phone calls. She is part of the system and won't fight for you unless it is easy. She would call opposing counsel and trust what they said happened in proceedings. I found out that to be a crucial error when opposing counsel lied about service of process and if Ms. Grant had just shown up or challenged it afterward, it would have saved me a lot of distress and money.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1986, New York

Law School Attended

Jacob D. Fuchsburg Law Center of Touro College
Class of 1985
J.D.

University Attended

Fordham University
Class of 1982
B.A.
Psychology

Associations & Memberships

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York; New York State Bar Association; New York State Womens Bar Association.

Contact Information

Phone

212-308-2200

Email

Send email to Patricia Ann Grant


Office Information
Patricia Ann Grant
Member
 565 5th Avenue, 9th Floor,
New York, NY 10017

Loading...


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.