Michael P. Graff

Attorney in New York, NY
Author: "Condominium Liens: Which Come First," The Queens Bar Journal, 1992. Co-Author: Report on Proposed New York Court Rule Regarding Interrogatories, Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committee on State Courts of Superior Jurisdiction, October 29, 2004; "The Art of Pleading - State Courts," Course Materials and Presenter, New York City Bar C.L.E., January 2008 and 2009. Panel Member: NYC Contract Dispute Resolution Board. Arbitrator: Civil Court of the City of New York. Mediator, Commercial Divisions of Supreme Courts, New York and Queens Counties. Mediator and Arbitrator, Joint Committee on Fee Disputes and Conciliation. Safe Horizon Mediator of Civil Court and Community Disputes. Formerly Partner: Kurzman, Karelsen & Frank, LLP; Moore, Berson, Lifflander, Eisenberg & Mewhinney; Becker, Goldstein & Graff. Safe Horizon Mediation Program. Mediator for Federal District court for the Southern District of New York, Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
917-902-7979
Free Consultation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Contracts
  • Condominium Law
  • Contract Litigation
  • Utility and Telecommunication Audit and Consultant Compensation
  • Restrictive Covenants
  • Probate Litigation
  • Commercial Real Estate

 

Overall Client Rating

in Civil Rights and Litigation
4.6 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.5
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
4.5
Value for Money
4.5

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 06/24/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Principal

Admission Details

Admitted in 1961, New York
1983, Florida
U.S. District Court, Southern (Trial Bar), Middle and Northern Districts of Florida
U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan
U.S. District Court, Northern, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second, Third and Sixth Circuits
U.S. Supreme Court

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    Brooklyn Law School
    LL.B.

    University Attended

    Michigan State University
    B.S.

    Basic and Advanced Certified Mediation Training and Apprenticeship

    Special Agencies

    NYC Contract Dispute Resolution Board; Safe Horizon Mediation Program; Joint Committee on Fee Disputes & Conciliation.

    Associations & Memberships

    The Association of the Bar of the City of New York (Member, Committees on: Law and Science, 1993-1994; Uniform State Laws, 1995-1998; State Courts of Superior Jurisdiction, 2003-2006; Litigati... More

    Bar Fellowship

    Master, American Inn of Court, New York Chapter.

    Representative Cases

    National Utility Service, Inc. v. J.R. Sexton, Inc., 1989 WL 343048 (D. Conn.); Utility Consultants, Inc. v. Beth Israel Medical Center, 307 A.D.2d 834, 763 N.Y.S.2d 466; Parkash v. UtiliSave Corporation, 295 A.D.2d 330, 743 N.Y.S.2d 889; National Utility Service, Inc. v. Savannah Food & Industries, Inc., 1994 WL 16182865, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182... More

    Hobbies & Interests

    Architecture and History of New York City, Central Park Conservancy Tour Guide

    Contact Information

    Phone

    917-902-7979 Call Now

    Fax

    212-246-6774


    Office Information
    Michael P. Graff
    Principal
     161 West 61st Street, 11th Floor,
    New York, NY 10023-7450

    Loading...

    Logo
    Michael P. Graff (New York, New York)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.