Joseph Tacopina

Attorney in New York, NY
Kings County District Attorney's Office (1991-1994). Faculty, Yeshiva University, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Intense Trial Advocacy Program (ITAP). Frequent Lecturer and Television Commentator; Legal Consultant, CNBC, MSNBC, Fox's News, CNN, Court T.V., The New York Times, The Daily News and The New York Post.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Civil Rights
  • Discrimination
  • Police Misconduct
  • Trial Practice
  • Assault
  • Drivers License Suspension
  • Drug Crimes
  • White Collar Crime
  • Expungements
  • Felonies
  • Juvenile Law
  • Misdemeanors
  • RICO
  • Securities Law
  • Traffic Violations


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Criminal Law, Litigation and White Collar Crime
5.0 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, New York
1994, U.S. District Court, Eastern and Southern Districts of New York
2001, U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
2006, U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
2007, U.S. Court of Appeals, 2d Circuit
2010, U.S. District Court, Connecticut

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Law School Attended

University of Bridgeport
Class of 1991

University Attended

Skidmore College
Class of 1988

Birth Information

Born in 1966
Brooklyn, New York, April 14, 1966



Associations & Memberships

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Representative Cases

Please click through our "notable cases" tab on our website for representative cases.

Contact Information


212-227-8877 Call Now




Send email to Joseph Tacopina

Office Information
Joseph Tacopina
 275 Madison Avenue, 35th Floor,
New York, NY 10016

Maintains an office in multiple locations

Tacopina & Seigel (New York, New York)

Play Law Firm Video
About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.