James Michael Sullivan

Attorney in New York, NY
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.6 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Business Reorganization, Bankruptcy and Creditors' Rights
  • Corporate/M&A
  • Litigation


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Bankruptcy and Litigation
4.6 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Corporate Counsel on 09/20/12
5.0 out of 5.0
James is a smart lawyer who understands business issues and is always on his clients' side. He is good at explaining complex and often unexpected bankruptcy and reorganization laws and practice to business clients. In addition to providing top-flight service, James pays attention to cost of the legal services, enabling a client to make good decisions about avenues to pursue in light of all of the cost.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 09/04/12
5.0 out of 5.0
James is a dynamic, very intelligent lawyer. I have worked with him in the past and I was alwasy very impressed. He is also very dedicated to pro bono work and gives a lot back to the community.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1995, New Jersey
1996, New York
1998, District of Columbia
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second, Third and Federal Circuits
U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana

Featured Lawyers

Kellner Herlihy Getty & Friedman LLP
New York, U.S.A.
646-248-6020 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A

Polizzotto & Polizzotto, LLC
Brooklyn, U.S.A.
718-475-6060 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.