Adrian Marshall Szendel

Attorney in New York, NY
Prior to founding Szendel PLLC, Adrian Szendel spent the better part of a decade at a sophisticated Wall Street law firm where he gained broad experience representing clients ranging from Global 100 companies to individuals. He has represented individuals from all walks of life and business of all sizes from various industries including manufacturers of high-technology and industrial products and components, financial services institutions, insurance companies, music publishing companies, general contractors, subcontractors, real estate developers, and retail establishments. His specific experience includes litigating multi-million dollar disputes on behalf of large corporations in state, federal district and bankruptcy courts around the nation, achieving precedent-setting victories on summary judgment on behalf of clients in state and federal court litigation and negotiating numerous complex settlements and facilitating major corporate transactions through careful drafting and negotiation of complex agreements, often going head-to-head with adversaries from some of the largest, most prestigious law firms in the United States. The depth of his background enables him to provide clients of Szendel PLLC with "large firm quality" serving in a cost-effective manner. During law school Adrian served as Notes Editor for the Case Western Reserve Law Review. He was also a member of the Niagara International Moot Court Team and director of the national Moot Court Team. Adrian also served as a Judicial Extern for the present Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Alice M. Batchelder.
877-365-0836
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info
  • Business Law
  • Litigation
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Law
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Arbitration
  • Mediation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Appellate Practice
  • Civil Appeals
  • Bankruptcy Litigation
  • Fraudulent Conveyance
  • Personal Bankruptcy
  • Business Arbitration
  • Business Associations Law
  • Business Dissolutions
  • Business Enterprises
  • Business Formation
  • Business Litigation
  • Business Mediation
  • Business Organization
  • Business Planning
  • Business Start-Ups
  • Business Torts
  • Business Transactions
  • Business Transfers
  • Buying and Selling of Businesses
  • Closely Held Business Law
  • Complex Business Litigation
  • Emerging Business Law
  • Entrepreneurial Business Law
  • Family Business Law
  • Family Business Mediation
  • International Business Law
  • Limited Liability Company Law
  • Small Business Law
  • Sole Proprietorships
  • Garnishments
  • Post Judgment Collections
  • Commercial Arbitration
  • Commercial Liability
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Commercial Mediation
  • Commercial Torts
  • Commercial Transactions
  • Complex Commercial Litigation
  • International Commercial Law
  • Negotiable Instruments
  • Secured Transactions
  • Uniform Commercial Code
  • Complex and Multi-District Litigation
  • Contracts
  • Breach of Contract
  • Commercial Contracts
  • Contract Fraud
  • Contract Litigation
  • International Commercial Contracts
  • International Contracts
  • Construction Litigation
  • Construction Insurance
  • Construction Contracts
  • Corporate Law
  • Closely Held Corporations
  • Corporate Commercial Law
  • Corporate Contracts
  • Corporate Dissolutions
  • Corporate Insurance
  • Corporate Litigation
  • S Corporations
  • General Practice
  • Federal Practice
  • Insurance
  • Commercial Insurance
  • General Liability
  • Insurance Coverage
  • Insurance Contracts
  • Insurance Bad Faith
  • Insurance Litigation
  • Insurance Mediation
  • Property Insurance Coverage
  • Property Insurance
  • Property Loss
  • Commercial Insurance Defense
  • Insurance Defense
  • General Liability Defense
  • Insurance Coverage Defense
  • Insurance Bad Faith Defense
  • Internet Litigation
  • Covenants Not To Compete
  • Confidentiality Agreements
  • Employment Breach of Contract
  • Employment Contracts
  • Employment Litigation
  • Employment Mediation
  • Executive Severance Contracts
  • Noncompete Litigation
  • Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation
  • Agreements
  • Commercial Leasing
  • Leasing
  • Civil Litigation
  • Complex Litigation
  • Defense Litigation
  • Federal Civil Litigation
  • Federal Litigation
  • Limited Liability Partnerships
  • Limited Partnerships
  • Partnership Formation
  • Privacy Litigation
  • Breach of Warranty
  • Manufacturers Liability
  • Product Defects
  • Products Liability Insurance Coverage
  • Trade Secrets
  • Theft of Trade Secrets
  • Trade Secret Misappropriation
  • Entertainment Contracts
  • Entertainment Litigation

 

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials

Position

Principal

Admission Details

Admitted in 2004, New York
2006, New Jersey
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey

Law School Attended

Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Class of 2003
J.D.
cum laude

University Attended

University of Toledo
Class of 2000
B.A.
magna cum laude

Associations & Memberships

Denis J. McInerney NYCLA American Inn of Court; National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys; New York State Bar Association; New York County Lawyers' Association; New York Cit... More

Contact Information

Phone

212-897-5870 Call Now

Fax

888-816-7114

Email

Send email to Adrian Marshall Szendel

Social Networking



Office Information
Adrian Marshall Szendel
Principal
 305 Broadway, 9th Floor,
New York, NY 10007-1109

Loading...

Logo
Szendel PLLC (New York, New York)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.