John W. King, Jr.

Attorney in New Bern, NC
Delta Theta Phi. North Carolina Real Estate Broker, 1979—. Attorney, Habitat for Humanity of Greater New Bern, Inc., 1995—. Attorney, Neuse River Region Association Of Realtors, 2001—. Pilot and provides flights for Angel Flight of Georgia, Air Lift Hope and Mid-Atlantic Angel Flight.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5
  • Elder Law
  • Foreclosures
  • Business Formation
  • Guardianship
  • Charitable Trusts and Foundations
  • Real Estate Exchanges
  • Successions
  • Real Property
  • Estate and Gift Taxation
  • Civil Litigation
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Estate Administration
  • Estate Planning

Rating Not Shown
This lawyer has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by his or her clients.

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1980, North Carolina
1981, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina
1983, U.S. Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
Law School Attended

Campbell University
Class of 1980
with honors

University Attended

Louisburg College
Class of 1975
magna cum laude

Wake Forest University
Class of 1977
cum laude

Associations & Memberships

Craven County Bar Association, North Carolina Bar Association (Member, Probate and Real Property Section) , American Bar Association (Member, Probate and Real Property Section), North Carolin... More

Hobbies & Interests

Flying - Instrument rated Private Pilot; volunteer pilot for Angel Flight of Georgia; Angel Flight and Air Lift Hope;Automobile restoration

Contact Information








Send email to John W. King, Jr.

Social Networking

Office Information
John W. King, Jr.
 310 Craven Street, P.O. Box 1654,
New Bern, NC 28563-1654


Stubbs & Perdue, P.A. (New Bern, North Carolina)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.