Downard & Associates

Law Firm in Nashville, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Social Security Disability and
  • Personal Injury/Car Wrecks
  • Worker's Compensation.
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Veterans Claims

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Social Security, Family Law and Finance
3.7 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 22 reviews
  • Recommended by 15 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/17/13
Posted by a Consumer on 10/17/13
3.3 out of 5.0
They do not keep me updated very well in what they are doing on my behalf for obtaining information or getting closer to obtaining disability. They have never interviewed me face to face to hear my side of the story or to help me obtain medical information to prove my disability.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 09/15/13
1.0 out of 5.0
They are incompetent. They showed up to my disability hearing with almost none of my documented medical reports. They didn't even know I had a court date until I called and told them and then they were very rude to me, their own client, for absolutely zero reason. I would not recommend these lawyers to anyone, ever!
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Paralegal and Office Manager
Office Manager
Office Consultant
Office Clerk
Legal Secretary/Intake Specialist
Intake Specialist
Office Consultant
Legal Case Manager
Intake Specialist
Office Consultant
Administrative Assistant/Paralegal
Related Law Firms

Nashville, Tennessee
615-686-2051 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.9 / 5.0

Nashville, Tennessee
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.