Gilbert Wayne McCarter, II

Attorney in Murfreesboro, TN
Bert W. McCarter, of both Savannah and Gallatin, Tennessee, is a founding partner of McCarter, Catron & East, PLLC, established in July 2009.

Bert completed his undergraduate studies at the University of Tennessee, cum laude, in 1992, after previously attending the University of Tennessee at Martin and Aquinas College, where he played basketball until 1994. During his tenure at the University of Tennessee, Bert was a member of the Sigma Chi Fraternity. After his graduation, Bert attended law school at the University of Dayton from 1997 to 1999, where he was on the prestigious Walter Rice Moot Court team. From 1999 to 2000, he completed his law school education at Vanderbilt University.

In 2000, Bert served as law clerk for the Honorable Judge Don R. Ash of the Circuit Court for Rutherford County. In 2001, Bert joined the firm later to be known as Dotson, Dotson & McCarter in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and remained there until McCarter, Catron & East was formed in July 2009.

Bert understands the unique challenges of a Murfreesboro criminal defense case. He began his practice of law, concentrating in the areas of domestic relations (i.e., divorce, custody, post-divorce, etc.), criminal defense, personal injury, and has argued multiple times before both the Court of Appeals and Criminal Court of Appeals. Additionally, Bert is certified as a Rule 31 Mediator. Our Murfreesboro divorce lawyer has represented numerous individuals and businesses in both the prosecution and defense of contractual litigation and personal injury issues.

Bert has worked on several high-profile domestic and criminal cases. His unique approach to the practice of law has led to numerous dismissals, a satisfied client base, and made him one of the most respected attorneys offering criminal defense in Murfreesboro.

Bert is an active member of the Tennessee Bar Association, Rutherford/Cannon Bar Associations. He has assisted youth as a soccer coach and as a local businessman offering services for the development of gross motor skills. Bert founded the 100 Club of Rutherford County, and serves on the Board of Directors and on the Advisory Council for CB&S Bank. When not advocating on behalf of his clients, Bert enjoys golf, reading, and spending time with his wife and children. Understanding the needs of modern families allows him to offer experienced Murfreesboro divorce advice and Murfreesboro divorce help.

In June 2011 Bert was appointed by Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey to the Judicial Nominating Commission for the state of Tennessee. In this capacity, Bert is proud to serve the state of Tennessee by working with the other members of the Commission in making judicial nominations to state appellate courts and the state Supreme Court when vacancies arise.

Bert is married to Kathryn Lischke McCarter
615-278-9016
Free Consultation

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Children Adoption Law
  • Agency Adoptions
  • Child Abduction
  • Child Abuse and Neglect
  • Child Advocacy
  • Child Care
  • Child Custody
  • Child Custody Mediation
  • Child Dependency
  • Child Protection
  • Child Support
  • Childrens Rights
  • Day Care
  • Fathers Rights
  • Foster Care
  • Grandparents Custody
  • Grandparents Visitation Rights
  • Juvenile Criminal Law
  • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Juvenile Dependency
  • Juvenile Law
  • Orphans Court Practice
  • Parental Kidnapping
  • Parental Rights
  • Parenting Time
  • Private Adoptions
  • Step Parent Adoptions
  • Surrogacy Law
  • Termination of Parental Rights
  • Third Party Custody
  • Visitation Rights
  • Family Law
  • Alimony
  • Annulment
  • Cohabitation Agreements
  • Collaborative Family Law
  • Property Law
  • Divorce
  • Divorce Arbitration
  • Divorce Mediation
  • Divorce Taxation
  • Domestic Partnerships
  • Domestic Relations
  • Domestic Torts
  • Domestic Violence
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Family Arbitration
  • Family Mediation
  • Gay and Lesbian Family Law
  • International Family Law
  • Interstate Support
  • Marital Agreements
  • Marital Property Distribution
  • Marital Property Settlements
  • Matrimonial Bankruptcy Law
  • Matrimonial Law
  • Military Divorce
  • Name Changes
  • Non-Traditional Family Law
  • Palimony
  • Paternity
  • Post Divorce Modification
  • Postnuptial Agreements
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
  • Restraining Orders
  • Separation Agreements
  • Spousal Support
  • Uncontested Divorce
  • Criminal Law
  • Assault and Battery
  • Burglary
  • Capital Offenses
  • Civil Forfeiture
  • Crime Victims Compensation
  • Criminal Antitrust
  • Criminal Appeals
  • Criminal Conspiracy
  • Criminal Defense
  • Criminal Forfeiture
  • Criminal Fraud
  • Criminal Investigation
  • Criminal Prosecution
  • Death Penalty
  • Drivers License Suspension
  • Driving While Intoxicated
  • DUI/DWI
  • Electronic Surveillance
  • Expungements
  • Extortion
  • Extradition
  • Federal Criminal Law
  • Felonies
  • Forensic Accounting
  • Forensic DNA
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Forensic Science
  • Forgery
  • Grand Jury Practice
  • Habeas Corpus
  • Hit and Run
  • Homicide
  • International Criminal Law
  • International Extradition
  • Mail Fraud
  • Malicious Prosecution
  • Manslaughter
  • Misdemeanors
  • Money Laundering
  • Murder
  • Parole and Probation
  • Post-Conviction Remedies
  • Search and Seizure
  • Sex Crimes
  • Sexual Assault
  • Shoplifting
  • Stalking
  • Theft
  • Traffic Violations
  • Vehicular Homicide
  • Victims Rights
  • Weapons Charges
  • Wire Fraud
  • Wiretapping

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
4.1 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.2
Responsiveness
4.0
Quality of Service
4.2
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 5 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 05/08/13
Posted by a Consumer on 05/08/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I hired Mr. McCarter to handle a child custody/parenting plan modification case. Mr. McCarter was forced to deal with two of the most unscrupulous, unethical attorneys unresponsive to Mr. McCarter's correspondence, failure to comply with the Rules, Entry of Orders notified after Mr. McCarter's review are only the beginning of the issues Mr. McCarter and his entire firm, McCarter, Catron, and East of Murfreesboro, TN. 4 attorneys and 22 months latter my case was settled with favorably.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 02/13/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I hired Mr. McCarter in the Summer of 2011 to handle my very contentious custody case with 3 children involved and coming out of Juvenile court going to Circuit Court. Essentially he fought for me on two different battlefields with two different judges and stood up to a difficult opposing counsel showing great charm and patience. He showed great instinct in guiding me thru a difficult emotional time and was professional and encouraging even when i lost my composure.We finished the case well.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 10/16/12
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Bert provided excellent service and value for the money. My ex's attorney was based out of Nashville and chose a mediator in Nashville. Bert's name preceded us to the mediation and in turn resulted in me leaving the entire process very satisfied. Bert gave sound advice throughout the entire process and was always available to talk. I have and do recommend his services to anyone I know needing council.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 08/17/12
1.0 out of 5.0
Overpriced for quality of services rendered. Mr. McCarter left me alone while still in the middle of mediation.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 2000, Tennessee

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    University of Dayton
    J.D.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1973
    1973

    Contact Information


    Office Information
    Gilbert Wayne McCarter, II
    Member
     101 N. Maple Street,
    Murfreesboro, TN 37130

    Loading...

    Logo
    McCarter, Catron & East, PLLC (Murfreesboro, Tennessee)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.