Leonidou & Rosin

Law Firm in Mountain View, CA
(650) 691-2888

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

About This Firm

Leonidou & Rosin's approach to the representation of clients sets it apart from other firms. The firm's high energy and skill have allowed it to obtain extraordinary results in all areas of construction law, ranging from planning and design, bidding, contract negotiation, construction documentation counseling and post-construction claims resolution. Leonidou & Rosin's services span every level of the construction industry from complex multimillion-dollar public works projects to independent and private construction projects. Leonidou & Rosin also has substantial experience in handling general business advice and litigation. The attorneys at Leonidou & Rosin offer sound legal advice and efficient service based on actual experience.

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law
  • Litigation
  • Business Law
  • Construction Litigation
  • Real Property
  • Civil Litigation.
 

Peer Rating

Rated

Average Peer Rating

Based on this firm's rated lawyers
5.0 out of 5.0
  • Lawyers rated at this firm meet very high criteria of general ethical standards
Shareholder
5.0 out of 5.0
Shareholder
5.0 out of 5.0

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Shareholder
Shareholder
Shareholder
Shareholder
Associate

Firm Details

Firm Size

6

Contact Information

Firm Address

Leonidou & Rosin
777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200,
Mountain View, CA 94040
U.S.A.

Phone

(650) 691-2888

Fax

(650) 691-2889

Email

Send email to Leonidou & Rosin

Office Information
 777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200,
Mountain View, CA 94040

Loading...



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.