Adam R. Schwartz

Attorney in Morristown, NJ
Member, Fordham Moot Court Board. Notes and Comments Editor, Fordham International Law Journal. Author: "In re Harrods Ltd.: The Brussels Convention and the Proper Application of Forum Non Conveniens to Non-Contracting States," 15 Fordham Int'l L.J. 174 (1992). Law Clerk to the Honorable Mary L. Cooper, U.S. District Court Judge, District of New Jersey, 1992-1994.
973-993-8100
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Business Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Surety Law
  • Construction Law
  • Fidelity and Surety

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1993, New Jersey, New York and U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
1994, Florida, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
1997, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey and U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York

Law School Attended

Fordham University School of Law
Class of 1992
J.D.

University Attended

Rutgers College
Class of 1989
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in 1968
Troy, New York, August 7, 1968

Contact Information

Phone

973-993-8100


Office Information
Adam R. Schwartz
Partner
 1300 Mount Kemble Avenue, P.O. Box 2075,
Morristown, NJ 07962-2075

Loading...

Logo
McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP (Morristown, New Jersey)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.