Benjamin B. Dean

Attorney in Monroe, LA
318-737-1502

Areas of Law

  • Foreclosures
  • Collections
  • Real Estate
  • Creditor Bankruptcy

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Bankruptcy
1.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Value for Money
1.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 01/17/14
Posted by a Consumer on 01/17/14
1.0 out of 5.0
extorted $15K from me. filed for illegal foreclosure,i agreed to pay $5K in illegal charges to get it over with,refused to accept payment for months to increase fees.never received ANYTHiNG from them or wells fargo1! learned Dean Morris filed with sheriff when a realtor knocked on the door,asked to buy the house before auction! i called sheriff, they were familiar w/ Dean Morris's activities,helped me have time to at least try to contact them, also look into 'property flipping scam' after katrina Dean Morris was participant
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Associate

Admission Details

Admitted in 2005, Louisiana and U.S. District Court, Eastern, Western and Middle Districts of Louisiana

Law School Attended

Mississippi College School of Law
Class of 2005
J.D.
cum laude

University Attended

Louisiana State University
Class of 2001
B.S.

Birth Information

Born in 1978
Monroe, Louisiana, November 30, 1978

Associations & Memberships

Fourth Judicial District, Louisiana State and American Bar Associations.

Contact Information

Phone

318-388-1440

Email

Send email to Benjamin B. Dean


Office Information
Benjamin B. Dean
Associate
 1505 North 19th Street, P.O. Box 2867,
Monroe, LA 71207

Loading...


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.