R. Edson Briggs, Jr.

Attorney in Miami, FL
Publication: "Compliance from the other side: Helping the Customer," ACAMS Today, 2007. Presentation: "Prosecution of Professionals under the USA Patriot Act: Lawyers, Accountants and Bankers," XVII Hemispheric Conference for the Prevention of Money Laundering, Panama City, Panama, 2003. Executive Board Member, Drug Free Youth in Town.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

Commercial LitigationReal Estate LitigationAnti-Money Laundering ComplianceFamily Law
Commercial Litigation
Real Estate Litigation
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
Family Law


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1994, Florida
2001, U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern Districts of Florida

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Florida College of Law
    Class of 1993

    University of Miami School of Law
    Class of 2003
    Interamerican Law

    University Attended

    Princeton University
    Class of 1990

    Birth Information

    Born in 1968
    Washington, District of Columbia, 1968




    Captain, U.S. Army Military Intelligence Corps, 1993-1997

    Associations & Memberships

    Dade County Bar Association; The Florida Bar (Member, International Law Section); Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (Board Member, South Florida Chapter).... More

    Hobbies & Interests

    Triathlon and Running.

    Contact Information


    305-702-3000 Call Now




    Send email to R. Edson Briggs, Jr.

    Office Information
    R. Edson Briggs, Jr.
    Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 850,
    Miami, FL 33131


    Cohen | Ruiz P.A. (Miami, Florida)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.