Dana Law Firm

Law Firm in Mesa, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Wills
  • Probate
  • Trust Law
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Estate Planning
  • Contested Wills
  • Long Term Care
  • Limited Liability Company Law
  • Asset Protection Planning
  • Estate and Gift Taxation
  • Trust Administration
  • Retirement Planning
  • Estate Tax Returns
  • Advanced Estate Planning
  • Guardian
  • Conservatorship
  • Estate Litigation
  • Bankruptcy Chapter 7
  • Federal Estate and Gift Taxation
  • Federal Tax Controversies
  • Income Tax
  • Inheritance Tax
  • International Income Tax
  • International Tax Controversies
  • International Taxation
  • Tax Controversies
  • Tax Law
  • Tax Legislation
  • Transfer Tax
  • Trusts and Estates Taxation
  • International Law
  • Foreign Asset Control
  • Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
  • International Treaty Law
  • Administrative Law
  • Administrative Litigation.

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates, Bankruptcy and Elder Law
4.2 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 11 reviews
  • Recommended by 9 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 04/21/13
Posted by a Consumer on 04/14/13
4.8 out of 5.0
Our lawyer was awesome! She took time to explain all the details of the documents we needed.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 03/29/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Everyone we have dealt with in Dana Law Firm has been wonderful
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Related Law Firms

Mesa, Arizona
702-749-0485 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.8 / 5.0

Mesa, Arizona
480-550-9880 | Email
Client Rating

4.9 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.9 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.