Eileen Kuo

Attorney in Memphis, TN
Ms. Kuo graduated from Duke University School of Law, where she served as Senior Research Editor for the Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy and as Editor in Chief for the Duke law school newspaper. Ms. Kuo previously clerked for King and Wood in Beijing, China and interned for the Court of Appeals in Raleigh, North Carolina. Ms. Kuo completed her undergraduate coursework at Duke University, graduating with high distinction for her honors thesis on human trafficking in the sex industry between Thailand and Japan.
(901) 462-2600
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2008, Tennessee
2009, Mississippi
U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Mississippi
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Law School Attended

Duke University
Class of 2008

Duke University
Class of 2009

University Attended

Duke University
Class of 2005
with high distinction

Associations & Memberships

Tennessee and American (Member, Section on: Labor and Employment) Bar Associations.

Contact Information


(901) 462-2600


(901) 462-2626


Send email to Eileen Kuo

Office Information
Eileen Kuo
 999 Shady Grove Road, Suite 110,
Memphis, TN 38120


Jackson Lewis P.C. (Memphis, Tennessee)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.