Frese, Hansen, Anderson, Anderson, Heuston & Whitehead, P.A.

Law Firm in Melbourne, FL
321-984-3300

Credit Cards Accepted

About This Firm

The law firm of Frese, Nash & Hansen, P.A. (formerly Frese, Nash & Torpy, P.A.) was formed in May 1989 as a result of a merger between two Melbourne law firms. The Firm's founding principals, Gary B. Frese, Charles Ian Nash and Vincent G. Torpy, Jr., had a common goal- to establish a law firm comprised of attorneys with diverse areas of expertise capable of providing quality legal services to a broad base of clientele. Because of the appointment of Vincent G. Torpy to the Circuit Court Bench the by Governor, the Firm's name was changed from "Frese, Nash & Torpy, P.A." to "Frese, Nash & Hansen, P.A." in December 1999, and to "Frese, Hansen, Anderson, Anderson, Heuston & Whitehead, P.A." in 2005. The Firm's principals are committed to specialization and believe that no one attorney can have sufficient expertise in all legal fields to provide cost-effective solutions to today's often complex legal problems encountered by businesses, corporations and individuals.

Areas of Law

  • General Civil Trial Practice in State and Federal Courts
  • Real Estate Development and Transactions
  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Probate
  • Wills
  • Trusts and Estate Planning
  • Municipal Law and Labor Law.
  • Federal and State Taxation
  • Trust and Guardianship Administration and Litigation
  • Elder Law and Medicaid Planning
  • Corporate and Business Law
  • Insurance Law
  • Employee Benefits
  • Municipal Law
 

Overall Client Rating

1.5 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Quality of Service
3.0
Value for Money
1.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 09/23/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Founding Shareholder
Shareholder
Shareholder
Shareholder
Shareholder
Shareholder
Associate

Firm Details

Year Established

1989

Firm Size

7

Payment Information
  • Accepts Visa, MasterCard and Discover
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
Clients

GENERAL COUNSEL FOR: Florida Business Bank.

Clients

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co., Logical Data Corp., Ken Constantino Builders, Inc., Jobear, Contracting Inc., Florida Moving Systems, Inc., Braid Sales & Marketing, Inc., Stevens Home Furnishings, Hanson Appraisal Service, Inc., Tensor Engineering Co., Florida Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., Hough Bros. Aluminum, Inc., National Realty of Brevard, Inc, Plymel Realty and Construction, Hobbs Electric, Inc., H.E. Electric, Inc., Sun Nuclear Corp., Advanced Cardiology Associates, P.A., Atlantic Plumbing, Inc., Suntree Community Developers, Inc., City of Melbourne Police Department, City of Palm Bay Police Department, City of Satellite Beach Police Department, Carroll Distributing Co., Mercedes Homes, Inc., Atlantic Mortgage, Mayer Homes, Inc., Hoyman, Dobson, CPA's, Gen Development, Inc., United Service Source, Inc., Brevard Orthopaedic Spine and Pain Clinic, Inc., Space Ground System Solutions, Inc., The Salvation Army. References: Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Florida Business Bank.

Contact Information

Firm Address

Frese, Hansen, Anderson, Anderson, Heuston & Whitehead, P.A.
2200 Front Street, Suite 301,
Melbourne, FL 32901-7389
U.S.A.

Phone

321-984-3300

Fax

321-951-3741

Email

Send email to Frese, Hansen, Anderson, Anderson, Heuston & Whitehead, P.A.

Office Information
 2200 Front Street, Suite 301,
Melbourne, FL 32901-7389

Loading...

Office Hours
Monday
08:00 AM- 05:30 PM
Tuesday
08:00 AM- 05:30 PM
Wednesday
08:00 AM- 05:30 PM
Thursday
08:00 AM- 05:30 PM
Friday
08:00 AM- 05:00 PM


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.