Lyn B. Schoenfeld

Attorney in Media, PA
Adjunct Faculty, Taxation, Widener University Graduate School of Management, 1984-1990. Faculty, Continuing Legal Education, Neumann College, 1996-2000. Judge Pro Tem, Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Family Law Division; Attorney-Affiliate, Women's Resource Center, Wayne, PA.

Areas of Law

  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Marital Property Distribution


Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
3.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 06/12/13
Posted by a Consumer on 06/12/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Lyn provided excellent legal representation during a very difficult time. Her knowledge and professionalism gave me the confidence that things would work out in a way that was fair and reasonable. She also had the savvy to tell me when I was being unreasonable and made me focus on the big picture - resolving the marital estate and moving on with my life and my duties as a parent.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1978, Pennsylvania
1982, U.S. Supreme Court
1983, U.S. Tax Court
1984, U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit

Law School Attended

Villanova Law School
Class of 1977

Villanova Law School
Class of 1983

University Attended

Bryn Mawr College
Class of 1974
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1953
Asbury Park, New Jersey, 1953

Associations & Memberships

Delaware County (Vice Chair, Family Law Section, 2006; Chairman, 2007) and Pennsylvania Bar Associations; Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association.

Contact Information




Send email to Lyn B. Schoenfeld

Office Information
Lyn B. Schoenfeld
 25 West Second Street, P.O. Box 900,
Media, PA 19063-0900


Schoenfeld, Surkin, Chupein & DeMis, P.C. (Media, Pennsylvania)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.