David M. Orf LinkedIn

Law Firm in Medford, OR
Attorney at Law Criminal Law Practice
541-772-8494

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

About This Firm

David M. Orf received his J.D. from the University of Mississippi in 1976. He has been a practicing attorney in the State of Oregon since admitted to the Oregon Bar Association in 1978. Attorney Orf specializes in the area of criminal law. Mr. Orf practices in Municipal, State and Federal Courts in Southern Oregon.

Support staff in his office is comprised of his Legal Assistant, Dana Couch-Blank and Legal Assistant, Carolyn Poole.

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Defense in all State and Federal Courts. Criminal Law
  • Driving While Intoxicated
  • Drug Crimes
  • Sexual Assault
  • Felonies
  • Misdemeanors.
 

Peer Rating

Rated

Average Peer Rating

Based on this firm's rated lawyers
4.4 out of 5.0
  • Lawyers rated at this firm meet very high criteria of general ethical standards
Attorney
4.4 out of 5.0

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Attorney

Firm Details

Firm Size

1

Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
Languages

Spanish (Use of professional interpretation services used as required for all non-English speaking clients).

State Bar Summary

Mr. Orf is a member of the Oregon State Bar Association.

Contact Information

Firm Address

David M. Orf
900 W. Eighth Street,
Medford, OR 97501-2908
U.S.A.

Phone

541-772-8494

Fax

541-773-6790

Email

Send email to David M. Orf

Office Information
 900 W. Eighth Street,
Medford, OR 97501-2908

Loading...

Office Hours
Monday
08:30 AM- 04:30 PM
Tuesday
08:30 AM- 04:30 PM
Wednesday
08:30 AM- 04:30 PM
Thursday
08:30 AM- 04:30 PM
Friday
08:30 AM- 04:30 PM


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.