Law Offices of Heather M. Sekella, PLLC

Law Firm in Manchester, NH
Experienced • Effective • Compassionate

Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

About This Firm

Law Offices of Heather M. Sekella, PLLC is an established divorce and family law practice based upon a reputation of integrity, professionalism and courteousness in our dealings with other attorneys, court personnel and clients and working with a passion and commitment to achieving excellence.

We may not always tell you what you want to hear, but we will tell you what you need to know to make decisions during one of the most challenging times in your life. The advice you receive will be carefully considered, applicable to the facts of your case and delivered with care and compassion. Our goal is to fulfill your goals with the best possible result, so please take a moment to visit other areas of the website to learn more about me, my team and how we might be able to help you.

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Paternity
  • Visitation
  • Fathers Rights
  • Grandparents Rights
  • Juvenile Crime
  • Domestic Violence.

Client Rating

Rating Not Shown
This firm has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by its clients.

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

Firm Details

Firm Size


Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation

Contact Information

Firm Address

Law Offices of Heather M. Sekella, PLLC
547 Maple Street,
Manchester, NH 03104

Phone 1

603-782-4708 Call firm now

Phone 2

(603) 623-1003


(603) 623-0399


Send email to Law Offices of Heather M. Sekella, PLLC

Office Information
 547 Maple Street,
Manchester, NH 03104


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.