Heather M. Sekella

Attorney in Manchester, NH
Free Consultation

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Paternity
  • Visitation
  • Fathers Rights
  • Grandparents Rights
  • Juvenile Crime
  • Domestic Violence


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
3.7 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 12/04/13
Posted by a Consumer on 12/04/13
5.0 out of 5.0
totally worth it. Heather is the best and she treats you like part of her family, not just some person that takes advantage of you, and takes your money and run, and leave you high and dry.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1999, New Hampshire
U.S. District Court, District of New Hampshire

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    Franklin Pierce Law Center (now UNH School of Law)
    Class of 1994

    University Attended

    University of New Hampshire
    Associates Degree in Business Management
    cum laude

    Notre Dame College
    Class of 1992
    Paralegal Studies

    Associations & Memberships

    Manchester, New Hampshire (Member, Family Law Section) and American (Member, Family Law Section) Bar Associations; New Hampshire Womens Bar Association; National Association of Professional ... More

    Contact Information


    (603) 623-1003 Call Now


    Send email to Heather M. Sekella

    Office Information
    Heather M. Sekella
     547 Maple Street,
    Manchester, NH 03104


    Law Offices of Heather M. Sekella, PLLC (Manchester, New Hampshire)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.