Blankingship & Keith, P.C.

Law Firm in Manassas, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • General Civil Practice
  • Litigation
  • Business Law
  • Contract Negotiation
  • Employment Law
  • Operations
  • Sale/Acquisitions
  • Tax Planning
  • Capitalization
  • Formation of Business Entities
  • Qualification and Operation of Non Profit
  • Tax Exempt Organizations
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Eminent Domain
  • Sale/Purchase Transactions
  • Condemnation
  • Land Use
  • Zoning and Development
  • Leases
  • Creditors Rights
  • Foreclosures
  • Collections
  • Bankruptcy
  • Personal Injury
  • Brain Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Motor Vehicle and Trucking Accidents
  • Inadequate Security
  • Products Liability
  • Education Law
  • Disability/Special Education
  • Student Discipline
  • Privacy Law
  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Separation Agreements
  • Custody/Visitation Disputes
  • Child/Spousal Support
  • Estate Planning
  • Wills/Trusts/Estate Administration
  • Taxation
  • Federal, State and Local
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Ethics and Legal Malpractice.

Overall Client Rating

in Business Law, Real Estate and Taxation
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 5 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 08/20/14
Posted by a Consumer on 09/09/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I had the pleasure dealing with Quinton Robinson regarding my tax issues. He took care of everything for me and lifted a huge weight off my shoulders. I would highly highly recommend this law firm!!!!
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.