Connor A. Sabatino

Attorney in Madison, WI

Connor Sabatino is an associate with Foley & Lardner LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Labor & Employment, and IP Litigation Practices.

Prior to joining Foley, Mr. Sabatino participated in the firm's summer associate program for two consecutive years. He also served as an intern to Justice Ann Walsh Bradley of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. His work before law school includes three years as a research assistant to Wisconsin State Representative Josh Zepnick of the 9th Assembly District.

Mr. Sabatino received his law degree (J.D., cum laude, 2009) and his undergraduate degree (B.A., 2003) from the University of Wisconsin - Madison.

Mr. Sabatino is admitted to practice in the State of Wisconsin.

608.258.4283
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • ADA & FMLA Compliance
  • Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation
  • IP Litigation
  • Labor & Employment
  • Labor & Employment Class Actions
  • Reductions-in-Force
  • Union/Employer Matters

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Associate

Admission Details

Admitted in 2009, Wisconsin

Law School Attended

University of Wisconsin - Madison
Class of 2009
J.D.
cum laude

University Attended

University of Wisconsin - Madison
Class of 2003
B.A.

Community Contributions

Contact Information

Phone

608.258.4283

Email

Send email to Connor A. Sabatino


Office Information
Connor A. Sabatino
Associate
Suite 5000 150 East Gilman Street,
Madison, WI 53703-1482

Loading...

Logo
Foley & Lardner LLP (Madison, Wisconsin)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.