Jeffrey C. Early

Attorney in Madison, VA
Delta Theta Phi. Member, Board of Directors, Germanna Community College, 1988-1996. County Attorney, Greene County, 1986-1988. Attorney, Town of Madison, 1992—2009. School Board Member, 1992—2013 and Chairman, 2002—2013. Commissioner of Accounts, Madison County, VA. Commissioner of Accounts, Greene County, VA. Member: Virginia State Bar; Virginia Trial Lawyers Association. PRACTICE AREAS: Personal Injury, Real Estate, Traffic Law, Litigation, Business Law, Local Government Law, Criminal Law.

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Business Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Criminal Law
  • Real Estate
  • Local Government Law
  • Traffic Violations


Overall Client Rating

in Real Estate and General Practice
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 02/04/15
Posted by a Small Business on 02/04/15
5.0 out of 5.0
I have complete trust in his ability to provide the best representation possible for our business and personal needs
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1984, Virginia and U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western District of Virginia

Law School Attended

George Mason University School of Law
Class of 1983

University Attended

University of Richmond

Roanoke College
Class of 1978
cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1955
Charlottesville, Virginia, December 12, 1955

Associations & Memberships

Virginia State Bar; Virginia Trial Lawyers Association.

Contact Information



Office Information
Jeffrey C. Early
 1287 North Seminole Trail, Suite 120, P.O. Box 620,
Madison, VA 22727

Maintains an office in multiple locations

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.