Neal B. Graham

Attorney in Macon, GA
Member, Mercer University Moot Court Board.
478-742-8820
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation
  • Nursing Home Negligence
  • Medical Malpractice

 

Overall Client Rating

5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 10/02/12
Posted by a Consumer on 10/02/12
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. Graham is most knowledgeable,compassionate attorney I have ever known. He listens, advises and makes his client feel so important. I would recommend him to anyone who requires legal representation.I am proud to call him my friend as well as my legal attorney:]
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1986, Georgia, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia, Georgia Court of Appeals and Georgia Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    Walter F. George Law School, Mercer University
    Class of 1985
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Mercer University
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    cum laude

    Birth Information

    Born in 1961
    Macon, Georgia, April 5, 1961

    Associations & Memberships

    Macon and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Georgia.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    478-742-8820

    Email

    Send email to Neal B. Graham


    Office Information
    Neal B. Graham
    Member
     200 Third Street,
    Macon, GA 31201

    Loading...

    Logo
    Buzzell, Graham & Welsh (Macon, Georgia)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.