Kevin Renfro

Attorney in Louisville, KY
President's List while an undergraduate student; Dean's List, law school. Recipient, KATA Outstanding Service Award for educating other attorneys and tireless efforts in promoting and upholding the civil justice system for the good people of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury


    Overall Client Rating

    in Personal Injury
    4.5 out of 5.0

    Communication Ability
    Quality of Service
    Value for Money

    • Data based on 1 reviews
    • Recommended by 1 Client
    • Last reviewed on 06/03/11
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
    Are you a former client?  Submit a review

    Legal Community Activity

    Experience & Credentials


    Owner/Managing Partner

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1981, Kentucky and Indiana and Federal Court of Claims
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

    Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    University of Louisville School of Law
    Class of 1981

    University Attended

    University of Louisville
    Class of 1978

    Birth Information

    Born in 1957

    Associations & Memberships

    Louisville, Fayette County and Floyd County Bar Associations; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Kentucky Academy of Trial Attorneys (Member, Board of Governors); Million Dollar Advocate... More

    Contact Information








    Send email to Kevin Renfro

    Social Networking

    Office Information
    Kevin Renfro
    Owner/Managing Partner
     9300 Shelbyville Road, Suite 215 A,
    Louisville, KY 40222

    Maintains an office in multiple locations

    Becker Law Office PLC (Louisville, Kentucky)

    Play Law Firm Video
    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.