Peter J. Mastan

Attorney in Los Angeles, CA
Member, St. Thomas More Honor Society. Note & Comment Editor, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, 1996-1997. Named, Southern California Rising Star (2009-2010) and Super Lawyer (2012), Super Lawyer Magazine, Bankruptcy and Creditor/Debtor Rights. California Insolvency Conference producer of "Current Issues in Single Asset Real Estate Cases," 2009. Co-Education Chair, Young Insolvency Professional program for the California Insolvency Conference, 2010. Co-Education Chair of the California Insolvency Conference, 2011. Speaker at the National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees' Spring 2011 Seminar, "The Barton Doctrine: a Trustee's Protections and Remedies for Dealing with the Vexatious Litigant." Member of the Panel of Chapter 7 Trustees for the Central District of California (appt. 3/11). Speaker at the 2012 California Insolvency Conference "Jurisdiction and Standing- Practical Implications and Lower Courts' Decisions Interpreting Stern v. Marshall." Speaker at 2012 Central District of California Panel Trustee Seminar "Chapter 7 Trustees and the Evolving World of Bank/Technology fees." Conference Co-Chair of the California Insolvency Conference, 2013.
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown

Areas of Law

  • Bankruptcy
  • Receiverships
  • Fraud
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Business Litigation
  • Public Corruption Litigation


Peer Rating

Rating Not Shown
This lawyer has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by his or her peers.

Experience & Credentials


Managing Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1997, California
2009, District of Columbia
U.S. District Court, Central, Northern and Southern Districts of California
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Law School Attended

Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
Class of 1997

University Attended

University of California at Los Angeles
Class of 1993

Birth Information

Born in 1970
Rolling Hills Estates, California, October 19, 1970

Associations & Memberships

American Bankruptcy Institute; Los Angeles Bankruptcy Forum; California Bankruptcy Forum; National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees.

Representative Cases

In re Slatkin (Johnson v. Neilson, trustee), 525 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2008); County of San Bernardino v. Walsh, 158 Cal.App.4th 533 (2008).

Contact Information


213-452-4900 Call Now


Send email to Peter J. Mastan

Social Networking

Office Information
Peter J. Mastan
Managing Partner
 550 South Hope Street, Suite 825,
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2627


Gumport | Mastan (Los Angeles, California)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.