Claire D. Johnson LinkedIn

Attorney in Los Angeles, CA
Order of the Coif; Delta Theta Phi. Associate Editor, University of Nebraska Law Review, 1957-1958. Teaching Associate, Evidence, Pleading, Practice and Procedure, University of Nebraska College of Law, 1958-1959.
213-683-6500
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Class Action Defense
  • Securities Litigation
  • Directors and Officers Liability Defense
  • Insurance Agents and Brokers Errors and Omissions Defense
  • Reinsurance Disputes

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Of Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1958, Nebraska
1962, California

Law School Attended

University of Nebraska
Class of 1958
J.D.

University Attended

University of Nebraska
Class of 1954
B.S.

Birth Information

Born in 1931
Tilden, Nebraska, November 28, 1931

Military

1st Lieut., U.S. Army, 1954-1956

Special Agencies

California Department of Insurance.

Associations & Memberships

Los Angeles County, Nebraska State and American Bar Associations; The State Bar of California.

Bar Fellowship

American College of Trial Lawyers.

Representative Cases

Canadian Commercial Bank v. Findley, 229 Cal. App. 3d 1139; Shapiro v. United California Bank, 133 CA 3d 256.

Contact Information

Phone

213-683-6500

Email

Send email to Claire D. Johnson


Office Information
Claire D. Johnson
Of Counsel
 Thirtieth Floor, 555 So. Flower Street,
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Loading...

Logo
Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian A Professional Corporation (Los Angeles, California)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.