Bijan Esfandiari LinkedIn

Attorney in Los Angeles, CA
Bijan Esfandiari is a pharmaceutical product liability litigation attorney and shareholder at Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman in Los Angeles. He has successfully represented clients in state and federal courts across the nation, at both the trial and appellate level, in wrongful death and catastrophic personal injury cases.
He has participated in several cases that have shaped and developed the law for the benefit of injured victims and consumers of pharmaceutical products. In one case of first impression (a case that presents a new issue for legal interpretation), the Court agreed with Bijan’s argument and held that drug manufacturers owe an affirmative duty to warn regarding risks associated with children's off-label use.
Bijan’s published cases have also exposed reprehensible corporate conduct. In one instance, a federal court in Pennsylvania allowed Bijan’s clients to proceed with their punitive damages claims after finding that internal documents demonstrated the defendant had “acted with a wanton and willful disregard for the safety of its consumers.”
Where drug makers have tried to convince courts that federal preemption (the doctrine that federal law preempts conflicting state laws) grants them immunity from state lawsuits, Bijan has time and again prevented their escape. In Mason v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., the first and only prescription drug preemption case to be heard by the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the drug maker argued that FDA approval of a drug shielded its manufacturer from fault even if the company later learned of harmful negative reactions. The court, however, sided with Bijan and held that plaintiffs’ claims were not preempted by federal law.
Bijan has likewise successfully opposed preemption in numerous other state and federal court cases. He co-authored amicus briefs in support of the respondents in the Supreme Court's landmark cases Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S.Ct. 1187 (2009) and Pliva v. Mensing, 131 S.Ct. 2567 (2011). Bijan received his bachelor’s degree (cum laude, 1999) and J.D. degree from UCLA. He has been selected to Southern California Super Lawyers® - Rising Stars for five years in a row and has an Avvo.com rating of 10 out of 10: Superb. Awards and Honors:

Selected to: Southern California Super Lawyers® - Rising Stars, 2009 - 2013
Avvo.com Superb Score 10 out of 10
Listed, The Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers™
Member, UCLA School of Law Moot Court Honors Program
424-278-9369
Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info
  • Wrongful Death
  • Catastrophic Injury
  • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Complex and Multi-District Litigation
  • Mass Torts

 

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials

Position

Shareholder

Admission Details

Admitted in 2002, California, U.S. District Court, Central District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
2006, U.S. District Court, Eastern and Southern Districts of California
2008, U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third and Tenth Circuits
2009, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
2011, U.S. Supreme Court
2012, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
2013, U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of California, Los Angeles
    Class of 2002
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of California, Los Angeles
    Class of 1999
    B.A.
    cum laude

    Birth Information

    Born in 1976
    Teheran, Iran, 1976

    Languages

    Farsi

    Associations & Memberships

    State Bar of California; The American Association for Justice (Member, Sections on: Products Liability; STEP-Toxic, Environmental and Pharmaceutical Torts); Consumer Attorneys of Los Angeles; ... More

    Representative Cases

    Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Sherwood Partners, Inc., 131 Cal.App.4th 802 (2005); Tucker v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 596 F.Supp.2d 1225 (S.D.Ind. 2008); Knipe v. SmithKline Beecham, 583 F.Supp.2d 553 (E.D.Pa. 2008); Knipe v. SmithKline Beecham, 583 F.Supp.2d 602 (E.D.Pa. 2008); Cunningham v. SmithKline Beecham, 255 F.R.D. 474 (N.D.Ind. 2009); F... More


    Office Information
    Bijan Esfandiari
    Shareholder
     12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 950,
    Los Angeles, CA 90025

    Loading...

    Logo
    Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, P.C. (Los Angeles, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.